5 Reasons Why A Nightmare on Elm Street: Part 3 Isn’t As Good As You Think

ON

5 Reasons Why A Nightmare on Elm Street: Part 3 Isn’t As Good As You Think

5 Reasons Why A Nightmare on Elm Street: Part 3 Isn’t As Good As You Think

Welcome everyone to the newest feature here at Coming Soon. ‘5 Reasons Why’ is dedicated to featuring, and defending, a controversial topic that is sure to spark a healthy debate among readers. Per the advice of our legal department (which is really just one guy who probably doesn’t even have a degree in law, but he dresses nicely) I am required to state that the views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of this writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Comingsoon.net, Mandatory.com, Crave Online or any of its other subsidiaries.

The Nightmare on Elm Street franchise is an interesting one. It has more bad movies than good ones, arguably, yet it is still one of the most well-known and well-regarded horror movie franchises of all-time. Freddy Krueger has become an icon of film and TV. Everybody knows who Freddy is. He’s like Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny- if Santa was a child murderer and the Easter Bunny wore a fedora. The films in this franchise leave much to be desired though. The original film is a classic, but the rest range from ‘pretty good’ to ‘mediocre’ to “Super Freddy.’ Most fans hold the 3rd entry of the series, Dream Warriors, in high regard. Some even say it’s the best sequel in the entire franchise. That isn’t true and we’ve already discussed which Nightmare sequel is the best. It most assuredly is not Dream Warriors. In fact, Dream Warriors isn’t as great as you think it is.

5) Wes Craven’s Involvement Was Limited

5 Reasons Why A Nightmare on Elm Street: Part 3 Isn’t As Good As You Think

Fans will be quick to point out that Dream Warriors marked Wes Craven’s return to the world that he created. While this is, technically, true, he wasn’t as involved as one might think. While the story of Part 3 is credited to Craven and Bruce Wagner, it was Chuck Russell that directed the film. He also wrote or rewrote a significant amount of the film, along with Frank Darabont. Nightmare on Elm Street Part 3 is certainly better than most of the films that came after it, but that has very little to do with Craven’s involvement. In fact, the bad blood between Wes Craven and producer Robert Shaye would lead to the two not speaking to each other until around 1994.

4) Neil, the Doofus

5 Reasons Why A Nightmare on Elm Street: Part 3 Isn’t As Good As You Think

Oh Neil, we hate you. For some reason, the creators of Nightmare 3 decided they needed a ‘strong male figure’ to balance out the rest of the teenage cast. This wasn’t a terrible idea. What was a terrible idea was casting Craig Wasson in the role of the dorky, boring Neil. We suspect Neil was written to be a love interest for the returning Heather Langenkamp. The only problem was, the two had absolutely zero chemistry. He was about as vanilla as one can get if vanilla lacked any sort of charisma and wore sweater vests. Nightmare 3 had a pretty eclectic cast of interesting characters that audiences would’ve loved to get to know more of. Unfortunately, Freddy killed ‘em all, yet Neil survived. Sometimes life, and death, just isn’t fair.

3) It Created A Monster

5 Reasons Why A Nightmare on Elm Street: Part 3 Isn’t As Good As You Think

To paraphrase Eminem, Dream Warriors “created a monster ‘cause nobody wants to see horror no more. They want funny for Fred Krueger. Well, if you want Freddy, this is what they’ll give ya: a little bit of cheese mixed with some sharp fingers.” Wow, that paraphrase turned out better than we expected. Anyway, Nightmare 3 was the catalyst that turned “a filthy child murderer” into a stand-up comic. In Dream Warriors, the humor worked. In subsequent films, it did not. Freddy became a walking punchline for a joke that nobody wanted. While he still maintained and, arguably, even grew in popularity, Freddy Krueger was no longer scary. He was funny, charismatic and “fun,” but he wasn’t scary anymore. Nightmare on Elm Street 3 created a monster, by forgetting a monster.

2) Heather Langenkamp’s Performance

5 Reasons Why A Nightmare on Elm Street: Part 3 Isn’t As Good As You Think

In the original Nightmare on Elm Street, Heather Langenkamp portrayed heroine Nancy Thompson. Nancy was the foil to Freddy and she was the only one who could face the Dream Demon. It was an iconic performance from Langenkamp that catapulted her into the very short list of all-time Scream Queens. Nancy was vulnerable, but she was strong. She was smart. She was creative. Nancy took it to Freddy like nobody else could before or after. With that being said, her performance in Nightmare 3 was dull, ill-conceived and, ultimately, pointless. Whether it was the direction, the writing, or the actress herself, Nancy just wasn’t what she could have been in this film. Her return was anticlimactic and her death was even more so. Which leads us to…

1) Nancy’s Death Should/Could Have Been So Much More

5 Reasons Why A Nightmare on Elm Street: Part 3 Isn’t As Good As You Think

When a character returns to a franchise to once again tackle the monster from his or her past, it should be a big deal. Laurie Strode returning in Halloween H20 or even Halloween H40 were perfect examples of a film doing it right. Halloween Resurrection, on the other hand, was a glaring example of what not to do. Likewise, Nightmare 3 saw the return, and subsequent death, of Nancy Thompson. While Heather Langenkamp’s performance as Nancy wasn’t great, fans could at least rest assured that at least her death would be meaningful. It wasn’t. It came out of nowhere, achieved literally nothing, and was forgotten about 5 minutes later. This was a lame end of an iconic character. Luckily, Heather Langenkamp would return to the franchise one more time in Wes Craven’s New Nightmare. In that film, Nancy would get a more-fitting end, even if she wasn’t technically “Nancy.”

Purchase now on Amazon.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

Box Office

Weekend: Jun. 20, 2019, Jun. 23, 2019

New Releases