The Bank Job is a bit of a throwback movie. This isn’t a bad thing, especially given the film is attempting to portray the early 70s. But to continue the comparison a movie like Heat (B-Luv’s number one Heist film) feels way more modern in terms of narrative style. The Bank Job is a blunt instrument at times and it’s not so much gunning for complexity as it is shooting for style.
The film, if you’ve managed to avoid the trailer, is about a true life bank heist that took place in London in 1971. Actually on that front I’d urge you to skip seeing the trailer if you haven’t already. I feel it gives away way too much in terms of plot that you’d probably be better off not knowing. The heist involves some particulars that are sensitive to the British government so all sorts of spies, double-dealings, and gangsters are involved.
This is also a very sensual film. Hmmm, I feel a little dirty even typing that. The opening of the movie proves my point though, a blurry montage of a topless woman in the water for no apparent reason. Fast forward to a sex scene which will later play a part in the plot. Fast forward to a few more sex scenes too. Nothing graphic mind you… just cheeky. Just a hint of the old give and take. Good Lord, I’m turning British.
The unfortunate part of The Bank Job is the weird tone it strikes throughout. It’s as if all the elements for a great movie are in place but the director (Roger Donaldson) can’t quite piece them together. The character interactions don’t always ring true, obstacles and triumphs are handled in the same “let’s get to the next scene” manner.
With that said this is a film worth seeing. It has enough twists and turns to keep you occupied and the elements of the heist itself are intriguing. I also enjoyed Saffron Burrows (who was also solid in Reign Over Me) and Statham is his typical tough yet unaffected self. The Bank Job isn’t one you’ll be quoting to your friends as you leave the theater… but you won’t be asking for your money back either.
