|
|
Your Weekly Guide to New Movies for
January 27, 2006
By Edward Douglas -
Greetings and welcome back to
the NEW Weekend Warrior, your weekly guide to the weekend’s
new movies. Tune in every Tuesday for the latest look at the
upcoming weekend,
and then check back on Friday for final projections based on
actual theatre counts.
THE BATTLE CRY:
Four weeks in, and I’m already worried I may run out of topics
to blab about--I’m always open for suggestions!—but this week,
I ask the question whether film critics are far too biased and
ornery
to be critics? (This
is a big topic, so I expect this to be an ongoing series of thoughts on
the “art” of film criticism.)
Film critics have gotten a bit of a reputation for being cranky, because
they tend to really go on the attack when they don’t like a movie (myself
included). You would think that critics shouldn’t be going to see movies
ready to dissect and pounce on any flaws the movie may have, when they
should instead be people who really love movies and want to try to find
the good things in them?
If you think of all the movies that do decent business despite getting
bad reviews—Flightplan comes immediately to mind--you have to
start asking whether those who are being paid to review movies really
know what audiences like and are the right people to be telling people
whether movies are good or not. The reason this comes up is that more
and more, we’re seeing mainstream movies being released without being
shown to critics beforehand. When this happens, the critics will then
turn around and say “Well, it must not be any good if they’re not showing
it to us,” which seems a bit like sour grapes, attacking a host for not
inviting them to a party. A perfect example of this is Ebert and Roeper’s “Wagging
Finger of Shame” review for anything they’re not allowed to see, and
critics immediately presume that it’s a bad movie worth watching. Then
what usually happens, is that they have to pay to see the movie, which
puts them in the perfect mood to give it a bad review. (Heaven forbid
that a critic needs to pay for a movie like everyone else does!)
In fact, the studio probably knows that the movie won’t get a good review
anyway, because critically minded people aren’t the right audience for
any genre that is deliberately mindless, and they realize that the people
who like that sort of movie will probably go see it anyway. I remember
having a conversation with a fellow critic about Underworld: Evolution,
and he was telling me that he couldn’t wait to see it because he hated
the first movie so much, and he couldn’t wait to tear in this one. I
mean, how messed up is that? No wonder Screen Gems kept it away from
the critics! (Frankly, I think it’s a shame. It’s not a perfect movie,
but it would have given them a chance to see Len Wiseman’s growth and
yes, evolution, as a director.) Certainly, average moviegoers are able
to find things they enjoy, and some of them even like those mindless
comedies or action movies that is a fate worse than the water torture
for critics to sit through.
Sometimes, you have to wonder if the age of critics plays a factor in
so many successful family comedies and movies targeted towards teens
getting trashed by critics. (As Exhibits A and B, I can pull out The
Pacifier and Fun with Dick and Jane.) Seriously, shouldn’t
there be critics of all different ages and genders, specializing in the
type of movies that are made for that specific demographic? One thing
I really like about ComingSoon’s other critic Scott Chitwood is that
he rarely if ever watches or reviews a family film without having his
kids there with him. Although plenty of well-known critics act childish,
it’s hard to imagine that they are the target audience for family films,
so it would seem almost mandatory that they include their own families
in the process and include their reactions in their reviews. (Maybe the
same can be said for romantic comedies or movies geared towards women,
too.)
It’s definitely something to think about when you’re reading a review:
is this writer at all like me, does he or she have the same tastes, and
is there any
reason for them to like the same things I do? If not, then reviews and maybe
even critics need to be taken with a grain of salt, at least when it comes
to certain genres of movie.
Next week, I’m going to talk about how hard it is for an indie filmmakers
to get publicity for their movie in this day and age.
TRISTRAM SHANDY:
A COCK AND BULL STORY (Picturehouse)
NEW THIS WEEK:
Not a very exciting week for new movies and nothing really jumps out
as something that must be seen. Hopefully, that will help The Matador,
one of my favorite surprises of last year.
ANNAPOLIS (Touchstone
Pictures)
Starring James Franco, Tyrese Gibson, Jordana Brewster, Donnie Wahlberg, Chi
McBride, Vicellous Shannon
Directed by Justin Lin (Better Luck Tomorrow); Written by David Collard (Out
of Time)
Genre: Drama
Rated PG-13 (for some violence, sexual content and language)
Tagline: “Where Heroes Are Born And Legends Are Made.”
Story: Jake Huard (James Franco) is a young man from a poor family who wins
admission to the Annapolis Naval Academy, but finds it tougher than he though
when he finds himself facing a superior officer (Tyrese Gibson) in the Navy
boxing competition.
Mini-Review: This by-the-books drama fails
to deliver on the promise of Lin's earlier work, by resorting to every cliche
from Officer
and a Gentleman, Rocky and other military or boxing dramas.
While the film is adeptly made, the cast just isn't up to snuff with Franco
brooding and mumbling through his part, and Tyrese and young Demi Moore lookalike
Jordana Brewster fighting it
out to see which one can be less believable in their role. The only mostly
likeable character is the one played VIcellous
Shannon,
but even
his
arc is
about as predictable as it gets. A safe and fairly standard film. Rating: 5/10
It seems like years since we’ve seen much in the way of a military
drama, a genre that has spawned minor hits for the likes of John
Travolta,
Jack Nicholson and Tommy Lee Jones. Touchstone Pictures’ Annapolis may
be hoping to do the same for its two fresh young actors, James
Franco, star of the recent dud Tristan & Isolde, and
former R’n’B
singer Tyrese Gibson, who last appeared in John Singleton’s summer
hit Four Brothers and before that in 2 Fast 2 Furious.
While this movie usually would only appeal to older guys, the two
good-looking
guys might help the movie bring in some younger women, as well.
More importantly, it’s the first major studio film for director
Justin Lin, whose indie crime-drama Better Luck Tomorrow became
a minor hit due to its grass roots marketing campaign to its Asian
teen audience.
Lin’s success also got him the directing gig for the upcoming threequel The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift,
out this summer, as well as an English language remake of Park
Chan-Wook’s Oldboy. Presumably
the pairing of these elements should help bring in an audience,
even though reteaming Pulp Fiction co-stars John Travolta
and Samuel Jackson for the 2003 thriller Basic wasn’t enough
to interest fans of the genre, despite them both of them having
done well in
previous
military dramas. Annapolis, not a very interesting name
for a movie in itself, is being given a moderate release into just
over
1,500,
maybe because Disney is trying to build word-of-mouth in a tighter
target market before expanding it. Not sure if that will really
help make it
much of a mark in its first weekend, although the first weekend
in February is slow enough to help it hold well if reviews are
favorable.
It hasn’t
really gotten a very big marketing push, at least not when compared
to Touchstone’s other January drama Glory Road.
Why I Should See It: It should be interesting to see how
director Justin Lin handles his first major film, especially with
other high profile
films on his horizon.
Why Not: This looks like your typical military academy drama
that we’ve seen too many times before.
Projection: $6 to 8 million opening weekend and a total gross of around
$25 million.
BIG MOMMA’S HOUSE 2 (20th Century
Fox)
Starring Martin Lawrence, Nia Long, Emily Procter, Zachary Levi, Mark Moses
Directed by John Whitesell (See Spot Run, Malibu’s Most Wanted);
Written by Don Rhymer (Big Momma’s House, The Santa Clause 2, Agent
Cody Banks 2, The Honeymooners)
Genre: Comedy, Cross-Dressing
Rated PG-13 (for some sexual humor and a humorous drug reference)
Tagline: “The Momma of All Comedies is Back.”
Story: FBI Agent Malcolm Turner (Martin Lawrence) has been assigned to
infiltrate the home of a computer programmer designing a “worm” that could cause a huge
national security disaster, so once again he dons the wig and dress of Big
Momma to become a nanny to the programmer’s kids.
Whether or not you liked Martin Lawrence’s style of humor when the
first Big
Momma’s House opened in the summer of 2000, you have to be impressed
with how well it did, since it took a fairly high concept premise of
an FBI agent in a dress and turned it into a movie that reached large
audiences.
It was certainly a big step in Lawrence being taken seriously as a
box office star (see below), although it seemed to be a one-off when
few
of his movies that followed did the same amount of business. It makes
some
sense that he’d want to return to one of his most famous roles, and of
course, Fox is always ready to try to make more money by revisiting any
movie that has made them money. Of course, Lawrence may have been
overshadowed by the success last year of Tyler Perry’s Diary of a Mad
Black Woman, which has a follow-up movie Madea’s Family Reunion coming
out next month. Original writer Don Rhymer is back, trying to bring
some of the same magic, although considering his last movie was the
remake of The
Honeymooners, which bombed, one can’t expect this to be a high quality
comedy. Obviously, Fox isn’t too confident in the movie, and maybe they
realized that this was a well not worth revisiting or else they would have
found it a better release, like in the summer. Getting it into 3,000 theatres
at least guarantees that it should do at least enough business in each
to make the top spot this weekend and that’s all that matters.
Why I Should See It: Maybe Martin Lawrence is funnier in a
dress?
Why Not: No, I’m pretty sure he’s not.
Projection: $15 to 18 million opening weekend on its way to less than
$40 million total.
NANNY MCPHEE (Universal
Pictures)
Starring Emma Thompson, Colin Firth, Kelly Macdonald, Angela Lansbury,
Thomas Sangster, Sir Derek Jacobi
Directed by Kirk Jones (Waking Ned Devine); Written by Emma Thompson
(Sense & Sensibility)
Genre: Family, Comedy
Rated PG (for mild thematic elements, some rude humor and brief language)
Tagline: “You’ll Learn to Love Her, Warts and All.”
Story: A recently widowed father of seven (Colin Firth) has to find a nanny
to watch over his unruly kids, who’ve scared off more than a dozen previous
nannies, a problem that may be solved when Nanny McPhee (Emma Thompson)
shows up not only to tame the kids but also help their father find a new
wife.
There’s little question that Emma Thompson is one of Britain’s finest
and most respected actresses, but not many people know that she’s also
a screenwriter, having written the Oscar winning adaptation of Jane
Austen’s Sense & Sensibility, the Emmy nominated HBO
movie Wit, and some uncredited rewrites on the recent adaptation
of Pride & Prejudice. Adapting the little known Nurse
Matilda children’s books is an interesting choice for Thompson, since it introduces
her to a younger audience who isn’t familiar with her work. It
also reunites her with another Brit comedy regular Colin Firth,
who last
appeared in Richard Curtis’ Love Actually. Because kids
won’t
really be seeing this for Thompson or Firth, it’s really the Mary Poppins
type premise that might interest them, and this will likely be the first
choice for parents looking for something a bit classier. Unfortunately,
this film may be too British for the kiddies, much like Rowan Atkinson’s
spy comedy Johnny English, which made around $27 million
in the summer of 2003 after making $9 million opening weekend.
Why I Should See It: The thought of Emma Thompson writing
a children’s
film in the vein of Mary Poppins certainly is appealing.
Why Not: Parents might be as scared as the kids to see Thompson
in so much ugly make-up.
Projection: $7 to 9 million opening weekend on its way to
$35 million
THE MATADOR (The Weinstein
Company)
Starring Pierce Brosnan, Greg Kinnear, Hope Davis, Phillip Baker
Hall, Dylan Baker
Written and directed by Richard Shepard (Oxygen)
Genre: Comedy, Crime, Drama
Rated R for strong sexual content and language.
Tagline: “A hitman and a salesman walk into a bar…”
Story: At a bar in Mexico, the hitman Julian Noble (Brosnan) becomes friends
with a salesman (Greg Kinnear), and then has to ask him for help getting
back on track when he feels that he’s losing his way.
REVIEW
Indie filmmaker Richard Shepard’s crime comedy about the chance friendship
between a hitman and a salesman become a big deal when actor Pierce
Brosnan decided to come on board as a producer and to play the leading
role of Julian Nobel. It’s a very different part for Brosnan, getting
him away from the suave charm of James Bond, and teaming him with two
solid underrated actors in Greg Kinnear and Hope Davis. The movie was
picked up by the Weinstein Company at least year’s Sundance Film Festival,
but they haven’t really gotten it very much attention in limited release
where it’s only grossed about $1.5 million, but Brosnan has appeared
in a lot of places to talk about it, and it’s been holding up well.
Although at its core, it’s a buddy comedy, it tends to veer closer
to smarter films like Sideways and Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang which
makes it a tougher sell to mainstream audiences who may prefer
shooting and car chases over talking and character development.
The movie’s expansion
into 800 theatres this weekend is a bit ambitious, but maybe Brosnan
can bring people in on a weekend where there aren’t too many other
strong movies.
Why I Should See It: The teaming of Brosnan, Kinnear and
Hope Davis makes for some very funny moments.
Why Not: Might be too tame for anyone who prefers slapstick
low-brow humor… I’d advise they go see Big Momma’s House 2.
Projection: $2 to 3 million in its first week of wide release on its
way to roughly $10 million.
IMAGINE ME & YOU (Fox
Searchlight)
Starring Piper Perabo, Lena Heady, Matthew Goode, Celia Imrie,
Anthony Head, Darren Boyd, Eva Birthistle
Written and directed by Ol Parker
Genre: Comedy, Romance
Rated PG-13
Tagline: “There Goes the Bride”
Story: When Rachel (Piper Perabo) meets Lucy (Lena Heady), a florist
who did the flower arrangements at her wedding, they become friends, but
as they get closer, Rachel starts wondering whether her feelings for Lucy
may
be love and how she’ll tell her husband Hector (Matthew Goode).
REVIEW
Following in the footsteps of Richard (Love Actually) Curtis,
screenwriter Ol Parker directs his first feature film, a British romantic
comedy that deals
with a love triangle between two women and a man, which falls somewhere
between Runaway
Bride and Kissing Jessica Stein. It’s a very different movie for
Piper Perabo, who first got attention with her starring role in 2000’s Coyote
Ugly, and who has been appearing in a lot of strange places in recent
years. For the movie, she’s romantically teamed with Lena Heady, last seen
in The
Cave and Terry Gilliam’s The Brothers Grimm, while the man in
the triangle is actor Matthew Goode, who has a smaller role in Woody Allen’s Match
Point and starred with Mandy Moore in Chasing Liberty. In an
interesting turn, Fox Searchlight is opening this in New York, L.A. and
San Francisco
this weekend with plans to expand it fairly wide sometime around Valentine’s
Day.
Why I Should See It: The make-out scenes between Piper Perabo
and Lena Heady, of course!
Why Not: Because lesbian romantic comedies have already been
done before and better.
STAR OF THE WEEK: Martin Lawrence|
Title |
Release Date |
Theater Count |
Previous Box Office (in millions) |
Weekend Box Office (in millions) |
Average |
Total Box Office |
|
Rebound |
7/1/05 |
2,464 |
$5.03 |
$2,043 |
$16.81 |
|
|
Bad Boys II |
7/18/03 |
3,186 |
$46.52 |
$14,602 |
$137.26 |
|
|
National Security |
1/17/03 |
2,729 |
$14.37 |
$5,266 |
$36.29 |
|
|
Martin Lawrence Live: Runteldat |
8/2/02 |
752 |
$7.37 |
$9,806 |
$19.18 |
|
|
Black Knight |
11/23/01 |
2,571 |
$4.31 |
$11.10 |
$4,317 |
$33.41 |
|
What's the Worst That Could Happen? |
6/1/01 |
2,675 |
$13.05 |
$4,878 |
$32.10 |
|
|
Big Momma's House |
6/2/00 |
2,802 |
$25.66 |
$9,158 |
$117.48 |
|
|
Blue Streak |
9/17/99 |
2,735 |
$19.21 |
$7,024 |
$68.21 |
|
|
Life |
4/16/99 |
2,594 |
$20.41 |
$7,868 |
$63.84 |
|
|
Nothing to Lose |
7/18/97 |
1,862 |
$11.62 |
$6,241 |
$44.47 |
|
|
A Thin Line between Love and Hate |
4/5/96 |
1,131 |
$2.62 |
$9.31 |
$8,232 |
$34.75 |
|
Bad Boys |
4/7/95 |
2,132 |
$15.52 |
$7,280 |
$65.65 |
The first
thing I wondered was if he had even heard of the movie. “I had seen
a poster but didn't know anything about it,” he responded. “Initially,
I was a little concerned that I wouldn't be interested, however, after
seeing the trailer, I admit that I am now very interested. The director
is best known for indie work over Hollywood mainstream, and indie directors
are more likely to take risks and deliver truth.”
Keith told me that he had seen many of the other military dramas like
A Few Good Men, Taps and An Officer and a Gentleman.
"Typically, it’s a genre I enjoy, but my fear is that, like so
many genres today, there is too much "Hollywood-ization" going
on just to get a pretty face or name in regardless of acting ability
or plot. Even Officer and a Gentleman was done before Richard
Gere was such a household name, but the story was compelling, and the
acting was very good. I do find that military dramas are appealing to
me--Heartbreak Ridge and Top Gun weren’t very realistic,
but entertaining.”
“I think that there is a risk to color a film
too much one side or the other, pandering to either the pro-war or anti-war
factions,” he told me when asked whether it was wise to release a movie
about soldiers while the country is at war. “When that happens, whichever
side of the political spectrum it falls on, I find that I’m less interested.
However, if the film succeeds in capturing the truth of the drama and
conflict that it is looking for; if it succeeds in showing our military
in a manner demonstrating the pride that most veterans feel/felt while
serving, then I fully support it. During times of war, if a film can
allow an audience to feel pride in the military--which by profession
must respond to politicians--but without being political, then I fully
support it.”
Although he was skeptical, the trailer certainly worked for Keith. “Now
that I have seen the trailer, I definitely plan on seeing this film,”
he said. “What I see in the trailer shows some common threads in this
type of film: a main character overcoming obstacles, a crusty older
or more experienced leader pushing the main character, because he sees
something in them, drama and military action. I will be pleased if the
life is not dramatized beyond reality too much, and if the drama is
as compelling as it appears.”
|
Title |
Release Date |
Theater Count |
Previous Box Office (in millions) |
Weekend Box Office (in millions) |
Average |
Total Box Office |
|
Hide and Seek |
1/28/05 |
3,005 |
$21.96 |
$7,308 |
$51.10 |
|
|
The Recruit |
1/31/03 |
2,376 |
$16.30 |
$6,861 |
$52.79 |
|
|
You Got Served |
1/30/04 |
1,933 |
$16.12 |
$8,341 |
$40.07 |
|
|
She's All That |
1/29/99 |
2,222 |
$16.07 |
$7,232 |
$63.32 |
|
|
Final Destination 2 |
1/31/03 |
2,834 |
$16.02 |
$5,652 |
$46.90 |
|
|
The Wedding Planner |
1/26/01 |
2,785 |
$13.51 |
$4,851 |
$60.40 |
|
|
Biker Boyz |
1/31/03 |
1,766 |
$10.11 |
$5,723 |
$21.91 |
|
|
The Perfect Score |
1/30/04 |
2,208 |
$4.87 |
$2,207 |
$10.39 |
|
|
The Big Bounce |
1/30/04 |
2,304 |
$3.34 |
$1,448 |
$6.47 |
|
|
Alone in the Dark |
1/28/05 |
2,124 |
$2.83 |
$1,334 |
$5.13 |
|
TW |
LW |
Title |
Weekend (in millions) |
Change |
# Of Theaters |
Average |
Week |
|
1 |
New |
Big Momma's House 2 |
$17.5 |
N/A |
3,261 |
$5,467 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
Underworld Evolution |
$12.6 |
-54% |
3,207 |
$3,929 |
2 |
|
3 |
New |
Nanny McPhee |
$7.7 |
N/A |
1,995 |
$3,860 |
1 |
|
4 |
New |
Annapolis |
$7.5 |
N/A |
1,605 |
$4,673 |
1 |
|
5 |
2 |
Hoodwinked! |
$7.4 |
-29% |
3,020 |
$2,450 |
3 |
|
6 |
5 |
Brokeback Mountain |
$6.8 |
-9% |
1,652 |
$4,116 |
8 |
|
7 |
3 |
Glory Road |
$5.4 |
-39% |
2,397 |
$2,253 |
3 |
|
8 |
4 |
Last Holiday |
$5.1 |
-42% |
2,442 |
$2,088 |
3 |
|
9 |
6 |
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe |
$3.8 |
-40% |
2,170 |
$1,705 |
8 |
|
10 |
7 |
Fun with Dick and Jane |
$3.6 |
-43% |
2,132 |
$1,548 |
6 |
|
11 |
9 |
End of the Spear |
$2.8 |
-45% |
1,097 |
$2,370 |
2 |
'
|
Est. Weekend Total |
Est. Avg. Drop-Off |
Est. Average PTA |
Copyright 2006 Edward Douglas
Take on The Weekend Warrior in the box-office
related movie games at:
Main
| Features
| Movie News
| Film Database
| Trailers & Clips
| Movie Release Dates
| Movie Reviews
| Top Previews
| Production Stills
| CS Indie
| Awards Hub
| TV News
| DVD News
| DVD Release Dates
| DVD Reviews
| The Weekend Warrior
| Box Office Report
| Boards
| Contact Us
| News Feeds
| Advertise
| Privacy Statement
| Terms of Use
| Copyright Statement
| Superhero Hype!
| Shock Till You Drop
Partner Sites: SuperheroHype.com CraveOnline.com ActionTrip.com DVDFile.com CraveFix.com CraveLyrics.com PSP3D.com Bloody-Disgusting.com RedBalcony.com Soundtrack.net SpikedHumor.com RPGamer.com TattooNow.com ImpactWrestling.com SeekLyrics.com PedalBMX.com WildKO.com vidKing.com StrategyInformer.com HHdb.com RapLeagues.com HipHop-Lyrics.com Cravecocktails.com ThePhatPhree.com RideJudge.com HottieSpots.com
Hosted
by NEXCESS.net

