|
|
Your Weekly Guide to New Movies for
January 20, 2006
By Edward Douglas -
Greetings and welcome back to
the NEW Weekend Warrior, your weekly guide to the weekend’s
new movies. Tune in every Tuesday for the latest look at the
upcoming weekend,
and then check back on Friday for final projections based on
actual theatre counts.
THE BATTLE CRY
(As always, the opinions
expressed in “The Battle Cry” and this
entire column are solely the opinions of the writer.)
This week, I want to talk about the controversy surrounding two recent
movies, Steven Spielberg’s Munich and Ang Lee’s Brokeback Mountain,
but before you start writing your letters, I’m not going to attack or defend
any of the sides of the arguments surrounding them, but talk about the
phenomenon they’ve created, which for whatever reason, hasn’t helped either
much at the box office.
Of course, who could forget 2004, the year where Mel Gibson’s The
Passion of The Christ and Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11
were all the rage for debate fans? You would think that this year’s
doozies would be doing just as well, considering how many arguments
have arisen, not only because of their content, but also about which
one is more worthy of winning at the Oscars. For every person who loves
either movie, there are three people who are violently opposed, something
that couldn’t be more evident than on the internet, where the movies
have driven wedges between critics, journalists and the best of ‘net
friends. I’ve had at least three debates with industry people about
which movie will win the Oscar, which has become as big a debate as
Scorsese vs. Eastwood last year, but even that’s not as big as the controversy
about how their respective subject matters were handled. It’s no wonder
that entire movie columns and blogs are devoted to the debate of the
movies. (For instance, my favorite “kill some time hang out” is David Poland’s Hot Blog, where
the debates have raged on for months now, and I was floored to learn
that there’s a whole message
board dedicated to discussing the Brokeback Mountain phenom.)
They’re both very unique films not only to each other but to other movies,
because they use a frank approach to delve into two hot topic issues,
gay relationships in America’s heartland and the war in the MidEast.
Although I’m straight and Jewish, I much preferred Brokeback Mountain,
because I just thought it was a stronger movie, even though it’s mostly
a work of fiction. I just thought that it found a good way to deal with
the tough issue of homophobia, and sure enough, the way the film is
even reviewed or discussed has become a big issue. For some reason,
it’s also easier to relate to a story about Heath Ledger’s conflicted
cowboy over the conflict in the mind of Eric Bana’s Mossad assassin.
While almost everyone at one time has felt like they might have fell
for the “wrong person,” few of us have ever been hired to put our aside
our own altruistic natures to kill others. It’s quite a testament to
Larry McMurtry, Diana Ossana and Ang Lee that they were able to make
such a stirring film without coming across as preachy. By comparison,
Munich just seems to drag, and usually, I enjoy political thrillers.
Of course, I’m aware of both sides of the debates surrounding the two
movies, and though I usually stay out of them, I’m still amazed how
many people aren’t able to just watch the two movies in terms of the
filmmaking or entertainment. The fact that these movies can open up
your mind to further thought or discussion is great, but you’ll always
have people who will try to read something into every single frame to
try to find ulterior motives. That aside, neither movie has really been
doing the type of record-breaking business as either Fahrenheit 9/11
or The Passion of The Christ. Maybe it’s because the films’ controversial
subject matter has been divisive rather than being something that brings
large groups of people together, whether they be devout liberals or
Christian fundamentalists. Anytime someone praises either movie, they
feel the need to dissect why they’re so great and important, thereby
doing the type of preaching that both movies try to avoid. Most people
feel that they need to make their own decisions, so all of those articles
and columns and reviews analyzing the movies are probably making them
seem too clinical as moviegoing experiences, so general audiences are
ignoring them in favor of more brainless entertainment.
Not every Jewish person loves or agrees with Spielberg’s take on Israel’s
revenge after the 1972 Olympic murders, and it shouldn’t be assumed
that every gay person appreciates Ang Lee’s love story, so those not
in either group, which is a lot of people, are deciding that neither
movie is for them. Hence, the controversy is doing more to drive people
away from these movies, especially those who don’t want to get caught
up in the ridiculous debates. The arguments just make it obvious that
reactions are mixed on both movies rather than being overwhelmingly
positive, as they are for something like Good Night, And Good Luck.
Of course, this may all change once one, two or all three get Oscar
nominations, and people realize that they’re worth seeing for the quality
of filmmaking, but until then, the debate and controversy is doing nothing
to help them and everything to hurt.
Not sure what I’m going to blab about next week, but feel free to drop
me a line about anything said in the column.
END OF THE SPEAR (Every
Tribe Entertainment)
NEW THIS WEEK:
The third week of January kicks off with one movie I’m looking
forward to seeing and one limited release expanding nationwide
which I hated despite
its critical praise.
UNDERWORLD: EVOLUTION (Sony/Screen
Gems)
Starring Kate Beckinsale, Scott Speedman, Tony Curran, Derek Jacobi, Bill Nighy,
Michael Sheen, Shane Brolly
Directed by Len Wiseman (Underworld); Written by Danny McBride (Underworld)
Genre: Action, Horror
Rated R (for pervasive strong violence and gore, some sexuality/nudity and
language)
Story: Selene (Kate Beckinsale) and Michael (Scott Speedman) continue to
explore the secrets of their respective bloodlines amidst the centuries-old
battle
between their two races, the vampire Death Dealers and the lupine Lycans.
Mini-Review: While there are a few of the same problems
as the original in terms of Len Wiseman's overuse of slo-motion and close-ups,
and at times, the CG looks a bit wonky, the sequel is a definite step up
from the first movie with more gore
and violence, a bit of
romance,
and
a stronger story.
With writing and acting that verges on the Shakespearean, Wiseman takes the
film into far more epic territory in a way that should make up for anyone
even slightly disappointed with the first movie. Rating: 7/10
In September 2003, Sony’s genre division Screen Gems took a chance on two
first time filmmakers, releasing a fairly low-budget action movie with
a great premise—a war between vampires and werewolves. At the time, the
film’s star, Kate Beckinsale, was only known for the romantic parts
in Pearl
Harbor and the romantic comedy Serendipity (below), so
few thought that she could pull off the transition into being a kick-ass
action star.
The film earned about $22 million, which at the time, wasn’t bad for a
September, and around $51 million total. It made almost the same amount
internationally, but it then really blew up on DVD, because kids who couldn’t
see the movie cause of its R-rating were able to catch it on DVD, and the
movie certainly would appeal to anyone who loved video games. Now, almost
everyone has returned for a sequel that promises to up the ante with a
bigger budget and better effects, as it reveals more about the war between
the two races. While not everyone loved the first movie or cared to see
a sequel, the possibilities of this sequel being better is there, mainly
because it’s getting a bigger budget. Unfortunately, action movies
starring female heroines have not been very successful since the
release of the
first Underworld. Movies like Elektra, Aeon Flux and Domino have
bombed, showing that guys don’t necessarily want to see even the sexiest
of women when they’re beating people up. Then again, the gothic and
romantic premise of the film, as well as its two stars, will probably
bring in
a lot more women than those other movies, and a lot of younger fans
will be trying to see this, despite the R-rating. Like their sequel
to Resident
Evil and their recent remake of The Fog, Screen Gems has
decided not to screen this for critics. Although that rarely bodes
well, the first
movie only received 30% positive at RottenTomatoes.com,
so they probably realized that the sequel will have to do well based
solely on the desire of the fans to see it.
Why I Should See It: Kate Beckinsale in leather, of course!
Oh, and the premise of a war between vampires and werewolves is still
pretty
cool.
Why Not: If you were as disappointed by the first movie, as
some people were, you might not want to give this sequel a chance.
Projection: $26 to 29 million on its way to $75 million total.
THE NEW WORLD (New
Line)
Starring Colin Farrell, Christopher Plummer, Christian Bale, August Schellenberg,
Wes Studi, David Thewlis, Yorick van Wageningen, Q'orianka Kilcher, Will Wallace
Written and directed by Terrence Malick (The Thin Red Line, Badlands)
Genre: Drama, Historical, Romance
Rated PG-13 (for some intense battle sequences)
Tagline: “Once discovered, it was changed forever.”
Story: When early British settlers arrive in Virginia, they end up in
a conflict with the savage natives, until the chief’s daughter Pocahontas (Q’orianka
Kilcher) falls for the leader Captain John Smith (Colin Farrell), helping
to bring peace
between them.
REVIEW
It has been seven years since filmmaker Terrence Malick’s highly
acclaimed war film The Thin Red Line was given a wide release
into theatres, and by then, Malick had already received a number
of critics awards
and other nominations. Later that month, it would receive seven
Oscar nominations, before being shut-out in all categories. Things
have changed
a bit since then, and his latest film, which takes a look at a different
time in American history, has not received nearly as much praise
or kudos, although it has gotten a bit of critical attention for
the
performance by newcomer Q’orianka Kilcher, a 14-year-old actress Malick hired to
play Pocahontas. The film also stars Colin Farrell, Christopher Plummer
and Christian Bale, a fine group of actors who were being ignored in
the marketing so that New Line could focus on the performance by Kilcher.
That changed with the most recent commercials which feature Farrell
and Plummer. Originally, the movie was due out in the early fall and
then it was delayed in hopes of getting included in the Oscar race,
which seems highly unlikely now. It makes you wonder why the movie wasn’t
given a Columbus Day weekend release. It played for eight days in New
York and L.A. over the holidays where it made a rather unimpressive
$177 thousand. That version of the film was almost 2 1/2 hours long,
but New Line had Malick edit out fifteen minutes for its wide rerelease.
That may not be enough, as this doesn’t seem like it will be of interest
to mainstream audiences, despite reviews comparing it to “Titanic.”
Why I Should See It: Malick’s attempts to show first contact
between British settlers and the American natives is a worthwhile
endeavor
Why Not: Plenty of reasons in my review above, but the
battle scenes aren’t that intense and the romance scenes aren’t very sexy. At
least it’s not as long anymore.
Projection: Between $3 and 4 million in its first weekend in wide
release on its way to roughly $10 million total.
LOOKING FOR COMEDY
IN THE MUSLIM WORLD (Warners Independent)
Starring Albert Brooks, Sheetal Sheth, Fred Dalton Thompson, John Caroll Lynch,
Jon Tenney, Penny Marshall
Written and directed by Albert Brooks (Defending Your Life, The Muse, Real
Life, Lost in America)
Genre: Comedy, Political
Story: Comedian and filmmaker Albert Brooks is hired by the government
to head up a committee to try to understand Muslims, so he’s sent to
India and Pakistan to find out what they find funny, in order to write
a 500-page
report.
REVIEW
Opening in limited release is the latest from comedy writer and
filmmaker Albert Brooks, whose work and delivery is often an acquired
taste. This
time, the material is more topical, and it allows some political
humor that will
probably
be appreciated more by intelligent audiences than some of his last
few efforts like 1999’s The Muse. It’s getting a slower rollout that
should help its word-of-mouth, and Brooks has the benefits of having provided
a voice for Disney’s epic Finding Nemo since making his last film,
which can only help with awareness on his return to filmmaking.
STAR OF THE WEEK: Kate Beckinsale |
Title |
Release Date |
Theater Count |
Previous Box Office (in millions) |
Weekend Box Office (in millions) |
Average |
Total Box Office |
|
The Aviator |
12/17/04 |
1,796 |
$1.35 |
$8.63 |
$4,806 |
$97.04 |
|
Van Helsing |
5/7/04 |
3,575 |
$51.75 |
$14,480 |
$120.03 |
|
|
Underworld |
9/19/03 |
2,915 |
$21.75 |
$7,462 |
$51.48 |
|
|
Laurel Canyon |
3/7/03 |
10 |
$0.15 |
$14,909 |
$3.66 |
|
|
Serendipity |
10/5/01 |
2,601 |
$13.31 |
$5,117 |
$50.26 |
|
|
Pearl Harbor |
5/25/01 |
3,214 |
$59.08 |
$18,382 |
$198.54 |
|
Title |
Release Date |
Theater Count |
Previous Box Office (in millions) |
Weekend Box Office (in millions) |
Average |
Total Box Office |
|
Are We There Yet? |
1/21/05 |
2,709 |
$18.58 |
$6,857 |
$82.30 |
|
|
The Butterfly Effect |
1/23/04 |
2,605 |
$17.07 |
$6,551 |
$57.65 |
|
|
The Wedding Planner |
1/26/01 |
2,785 |
$13.51 |
$4,851 |
$60.40 |
|
|
A Walk To Remember |
1/25/02 |
2,411 |
$12.18 |
$5,051 |
$41.23 |
|
|
Darkness Falls |
1/24/03 |
2,837 |
$12.02 |
$4,239 |
$32.54 |
|
|
The Count of Monte Cristo |
1/25/02 |
2,007 |
$11.38 |
$5,668 |
$54.23 |
|
|
The Mothman Prophecies |
1/25/02 |
2,331 |
$11.21 |
$4,809 |
$35.23 |
|
|
Win a Date with Tad Hamilton! |
1/23/04 |
2,711 |
$7.32 |
$2,700 |
$16.96 |
|
|
Kung Pow: Enter the Fist |
1/25/02 |
2,478 |
$7.02 |
$2,832 |
$16.03 |
|
|
Sugar and Spice |
1/26/01 |
2,150 |
$6.03 |
$2,802 |
$13.28 |
|
|
Eye of the Beholder |
1/28/00 |
1,751 |
$0.03 |
$5.96 |
$3,404 |
$16.35 |
|
TW |
LW |
Title |
Weekend (in millions) |
Change |
# Of Theaters |
Average |
Week |
|
1 |
New |
Underworld: Evolution |
$27.6 |
N/A |
3,207 |
$8,606 |
1 |
|
2 |
3 |
Hoodwinked! |
$9.1 |
-27% |
3,002 |
$3,031 |
2 |
|
3 |
1 |
Glory Road |
$7.7 |
-43% |
2,396 |
$3,214 |
2 |
|
4 |
2 |
Glory Road |
$7.2 |
-44% |
2,514 |
$2,864 |
2 |
|
5 |
9 |
Brokeback Mountain |
$7.0 |
21% |
1,194 |
$5,863 |
7 |
|
6 |
5 |
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe |
$5.2 |
-48% |
2,757 |
$1,886 |
7 |
|
7 |
6 |
Fun with Dick and Jane |
$5.0 |
-43% |
2,850 |
$1,769 |
5 |
|
8 |
4 |
Hostel |
$4.7 |
-53% |
2,258 |
$2,081 |
3 |
|
9 |
8 |
King Kong |
$3.4 |
-55% |
2,193 |
$1,550 |
6 |
|
10 |
New |
The New World |
$3.2 |
N/A |
911 |
$3,946 |
1 |
|
11 |
New |
End of the Spear |
$3.1 |
N/A |
1,158 |
$2,677 |
2 |
| Est. Weekend Total |
Est. Avg. Drop-Off |
Est. Average PTA |
Copyright 2006 Edward Douglas
Take on The Weekend Warrior in the box-office
related movie games at:
Main
| Features
| Movie News
| Film Database
| Trailers & Clips
| Movie Release Dates
| Movie Reviews
| Top Previews
| Production Stills
| CS Indie
| Awards Hub
| TV News
| DVD News
| DVD Release Dates
| DVD Reviews
| The Weekend Warrior
| Box Office Report
| Boards
| Contact Us
| News Feeds
| Advertise
| Privacy Statement
| Terms of Use
| Copyright Statement
| Superhero Hype!
| Shock Till You Drop
Partner Sites: SuperheroHype.com CraveOnline.com ActionTrip.com DVDFile.com CraveFix.com CraveLyrics.com PSP3D.com Bloody-Disgusting.com RedBalcony.com Soundtrack.net SpikedHumor.com RPGamer.com TattooNow.com ImpactWrestling.com SeekLyrics.com PedalBMX.com WildKO.com vidKing.com StrategyInformer.com HHdb.com RapLeagues.com HipHop-Lyrics.com Cravecocktails.com ThePhatPhree.com RideJudge.com HottieSpots.com
Hosted
by NEXCESS.net

