Movie Reviews

The Twilight Saga: New Moon

Reviewed by: Edward Douglas
Rating:
4 out of 10
Movie Details:
View here

Cast:
Kristen Stewart as Bella Swan
Robert Pattinson as Edward Cullen
Taylor Lautner as Jacob Black
Ashley Greene as Alice Cullen
Jackson Rathbone as Jasper Whitlock
Michael Sheen as Aro
Dakota Fanning as Jane
Jamie Campbell Bower as Caius
Christopher Heyerdahl as Marcus
Peter Facinelli as Dr. Carlisle Cullen
Anna Kendrick as Jessica
Michael Welch as Mike
Justin Chon as Eric
Christian Serratos as Angela
Christina Jastrzembska as Gran
Billy Burke as Charlie Swan
Daniel Cudmore as Felix
Charlie Bewley as Demetri
Rachelle Lefevre as Victoria
Elizabeth Reaser as Esme Cullen
Kellan Lutz as Emmett Cullen
Nikki Reed as Rosalie Hale
Chaske Spencer as Sam Uley
Gil Birmingham as Billy Black
Graham Greene as Harry Clearwater
Michael Adamthwaite as Chet
Kiowa Gordon as Embry Call
Tyson Houseman as Quil Ateara
Alex Meraz as Paul
Bronson Pelletier as Jared
Edi Gathegi as Laurent
Tinsel Korey as Emily

Directed by Chris Weitz

Summary:
Despite the change in director and the addition of some stronger actors, "New Moon" isn't just more of the same; at times, it's even more grueling than the first movie. The sporadic action and decent FX do make up for it, but only barely.

Story:
After an unfortunate incident at the 18th birthday party for Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart), her immortal vampire lover Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson) and his family leave Forks, Washington, leaving the miserable girl pining for him. Over the next few months, she starts spending more time with her Native-American friend Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner) to help get over her loss only to learn that the boy also has a supernatural secret.

Analysis:
As with any sequel, such as this anticipated second installment in Stephenie Meyer's supernatural teen romance, one needn't worry whether the movie lives up to the book or not, especially if like me, you've never read it and have no intentions of ever doing so. No, the real question on the minds of fan and detractor alike is whether the second movie helmed by Chris Weitz can improve upon the first movie's obvious flaws and whether having gotten introductions and general set-up out of the way, the story can be taken in a more interesting direction a second time around.

You probably needn't have read the book to know the general plot of the sequel by now, but it opens with Bella worrying about aging while being romantically involved with an immortal vampire. Edward refuses to change her, and an incident at a birthday party thrown for Bella's birthday reminds us all why vampires and humans shouldn't mix. Edward and his family leave Forks, Washington in order to protect Bella from themselves. After months of hiding out in her house moping over the break-up, Bella starts hanging out with her Native American friend Jacob (Taylor Lautner), who also has fallen in love with her, and she starts being more reckless, after realizing that she has visions of Edward whenever she's in danger, one of the ideas introduced in "New Moon" that reinforces the idea that author Stephenie Meyers is literally throwing every idea she has at the wall to see if any of it sticks.

The writing is godawful, trite cliché ridden, and not even up to the par of most soap operas, and despite his "American Pie" roots, Weitz doesn't have Hardwicke's chops at pulling strong performances out of the cast of young actors. One might excuse some of it, since Weitz was essentially stuck with the cast hired by Hardwicke for her film, a similar challenge faced by the various directors of the "Harry Potter" series who actually worked harder to turn that cast into great actors, but Weitz isn't able to get any of the leads to step up their game even a little from the first movie.

The grueling pace of all the incessant and mostly unnecessary exposition and drama might not be so bad if Kristen Stewart could pull any of it off with even the slightest amount of emotion. Instead, we have to endure over two hours of her moping, mumbling lines through gritted teeth in the same bored monotone she seems to be incapable of getting away from, putting big gaps in every statement in order to try to give them weight. Pattinson's presence in the movie at the beginning, end and in Bella's visions, mainly consists of him standing around with an ever-present smirk, casually delivering a few lines with very little gusto. In just two movies, he's been relegated to eye candy for teen girls to swoon over rather than a character anyone else could truly care about.

Taylor Lautner wasn't very good in his small role in the first movie, but his role has been expanded to create another leg in Bella's supernatural love triangle. It's more than a little odd when we see the long-haired Jacob cozying up with Bella at a movie theater then a few minutes later, he's sporting cropped hair, walking around shirtless (as he'll be for the rest of the movie) and looking and acting completely different. We have absolutely no idea how much time has passed, but apparently, it's been months, something we learn in conversation about how Jacob has fallen in with a bad seed from his tribe named Sam who is leading a band of werewolves in a crusade against vampires who breach their treaty by entering Forks.

While not even mentioned in the first movie, the shirtless Wolf Pack are everywhere in the sequel, as they try to protect Forks from all these invading vampires. Fortunately, they look far more menacing in their wolf form than any of the vampires, but the action choreography is weak and sloppy, not that we spend more than a few minutes in action mode, before we're right back to more talking and exposition.

The film gets infinitely more interesting when Bella travels to Italy to stop the despondent Edward from committing suicide after he thinks Bella has been killed, allowing us to admire the strongest additions to the cast: Michael Sheen as the head of the Volturi, sort of a vampire Pope at the head of a vampire Mafia, while Dakota Fanning is particularly underused, saying a few lines and showing her powers then done. Who knows why the talented actress thought that was a good career move after starring as the lead in countless movies? Neither of them have very much to do until roughly the last half hour of the movie, but they're easily a leap above the rest of the cast.

In trying to remain faithful to the source material, "New Moon" allows for a lot of unnecessary fat in the storytelling. Rachel LeFevre's Victoria is back so briefly, going after Bella now that the Cullens aren't around to protect her, that one wonders why she's even in the movie. (She's actually quite good in those brief moments, so why is she being replaced for the third movie?) The cast was already fairly unwieldy for the first movie, and the amount of time Bella spends with her human friends does nothing for the overall story, except to add some weak comic relief, which feels completely out of place with the dark romantic tone of the rest of the movie. Because the story is meant to be about the love triangle between Bella, Edward and Jacob, there is no need for another love interest to be introduced as Bella's friend Mike also spends much of the movie looking at her all moon-eyed. One starts to wonder whether the blatant "Romeo and Juliet" references early in the movie are meant as a boast about Meyers replacing Shakespeare's classic love story in young girls' hearts?

To her credit, Hardwicke created a gorgeous looking movie that greatly took advantage of the Vancouver locations where it was shot, and the music was used well. While "New Moon" has an impressive soundtrack album, most of the pop-rock tunes don't mesh as well with the visuals or what is taking place in the story, making it clear that Weitz may not have been the best match for the franchise.

To add insult to injury, we don't even get an entire story; like in Weitz's "The Golden Compass," the movie ends with a cliffhanger. Not that any of the fans will care since they'll patiently wait the seven months for the continuation whether they like this installment or not.

The Bottom Line:
Like "Twilight," the sequel alternates between grueling amounts of bad dialogue and silly humor for the teen set, and except for a few moments involving the werewolves and the Volturi, it's fairly dismissible drivel whose popularity among seemingly smart young women will forever elude anyone else.

| 34 comments | Add a comment

COMMENTS (34)

Posted by:
Aimee
November 20, 2009
"Who knows why the talented actress thought that was a good career move after starring as the lead in countless movies?"
Believe it or not, it's because she's just as much of a Twilight fan as the rest of the 12 year olds in the world, and she is just as much of a Robert Pattinson "he's so gorgeous" fan as well.
"...so why is she being replaced for the third movie?"
She wasn't replaced. She signed on for another movie that created scheduling conflicts with Eclipse.
Posted by:
Kristen
November 20, 2009
Wow, I'm so sorry that you had to waste two hours of your life watching such a...oh, what's the word you used? "dismissible drivel" of a movie...and I'm sorry that I just wasted 15 minutes of my life reading your horrid review. I know you took the shirtless wolfpack scenes as a ploy to lure in more teen girls, but if you would have read the books you would've understood that the wolfpack doesn't wear shirts 1) because they don't need them...they stay at a constant 108 degrees and 2) when they phase, their clothes rip to shreds (so why ruin perfectly good shirt when they don't even need to be wearing one?). Personally I find your review irrelevant and really wish that non-Twilight fans would just stop reviewing Twilight movies. It's quite a waste of your time and energy.
Posted by:
sneaky petes
November 20, 2009
You guys, I love Jacob. his muscles are so big. I wish my boyfriend had muscles like him. And hair that nice. I also wish my boyfriend loved me like Edvard loves Bella. I love the wolfpack. I got a t-shirt on the intrawebs with the wolfpack on it. I hope you guys on the intrawebs will realize chicks dig twilight and nothing else in life matters. I'm so emotional right now.
Posted by:
Kim
November 21, 2009
Way to fact check buddy, the first movie was shot in Portland, New Moon and Eclipse were the movies shot in Vancouver.

The wolf pack WAS briefly mentioned in the first movie, as you do see in this movie because Jacob explains to Bella the she already knows what he is, but the wolves really had nothing to do with the first movie. They weren't important until this one.

Mike's really not a love interest at all, he has a crush on her but it's more than obvious that he doesn't have a shot in hell at anything ever happening with Bella...

Oh and just because this bothered me, I have to say I believe I saw the word "grueling" in that review just a tad too many times. Maybe you should invest in a thesaurus. It's quite useful.

To fans of the book, you should really enjoy the movie. It's pretty close to the book and while parts were a bit rushed, I think it was much better than Twilight. Non fans... well I have a few friends that haven't read the books and saw the movie, and some were kind of "eh," and the rest loved it, so I don't know. I think it's worth giving it a shot, most people I know thought they'd hate it and loved it so... yeah. Go see it.
Posted by:
Trent Gunner
November 21, 2009
Just a general statement to defend Mr. Douglas and the other critics who have reviewed this film poorly, much to the ire of some of the fans who posted above me. It is a critic's job to see these kinds of films, they really do not have much say in the matter. This film is one of the biggest films to come out this month, and if they did not review this film, they would not be doing their job correctly. If only Twilight fans reviewed these films, there would be an unfair bias towards the film that would portray the film in a potentially incorrect light. Negative reviews are part of film, it happens to all of them, it is something that we all just have to deal with.

To the person who said that they wasted fifteen minutes of their life reading the review, my question to you is why did you keep reading? I mean, you saw right away that the film recieved an unfavorable review. If you knew that it was going to go that way, why bother reading it? And to be honest, calling Mr. Douglas' critique "horrid" is a bit rude. Just agree to diagree and move on, there is no reason to be disrespectful about something like this. Like I said, negative reviews happen and life goes on.

Although I do have to admit, I am perplexed regarding the whole shirtless werewolf thing myself. I mean, even if the reasons for this are cited in the book, it just seems odd because I never recall seeing Lon Chaney Jr. wandering around shirtless in the original 'Wolfman' film, that is definitely something I would remember. And just another general question about the werewolves, can they transform at random or only during a full moon? I'm just curious.
Posted by:
Justin D.
November 21, 2009
I'm sure you were being kind to the movie Mr. Douglas, but otherwise you provided a good summary of the pig fodder that is this series. I foresee this review being littered with negative comments by mindless fangirl drones leaping at the chance to defend their beloved Mormon allegory. Oh wait, I'm too late, they've already come. Some of them are even criticizing tiny little grammatical "errors" in your critique in a flimsy attempt to sound intelligent because, as even they are aware, in order to enjoy this series a person must remove their brain and as such cannot be smart. It's okay that you like this series. It's just tragic that none of you can acknowledge the obvious and numerous flaws in it, nor understand why most non female/teeny boppers can't get behind this slag.
Posted by:
Matt
November 21, 2009
By the way an a spoiler warning here
In the last installment it is mentioned that the wolfpack are not true werewolves buy rather shape shifters. The quiellete who originally shape shifted chose the form of a wolf after seeing one and that choice has been passed down genetically through generations. Just to clear up the whole why can they phase when they want to thing.
Posted by:
Scott
November 21, 2009
I LOVE hearing female Twilight fans just seeth at the negative reviews for the movie, as if the reviewers are personally insulting them. Keep 'em coming. Hilarious stuff.
Posted by:
Nancy
November 21, 2009
Thank you for your kind words Nemo. May I call you CLOWN fish? Or how about just CLOWN? I am assuming your SN does not come from being partial to Verne.
Will's writings certainly are quite good. You are right though, I don't care too terribly much for stumbling through Reformation/Elizabethan period type plays. Especially with all the scenes and acts. Too much for my simple mind.
I LIKE the Twilight saga books, and I also liked the "New Moon" movie.
As far as sci fi fantasy reading. I like George R.R. Martin, I like J.K. Rowling, I like Tolkien, (tough reads, I managed.) I like Tad Williams. Pathetic of me, I know.
Excuse me, but I am drawn back to "Farewell To Arms". Ernest is in the zone, and I'll save a buck on electricity since light has broken in yonder window. (2.2)
Posted by:
Tyler Durden
November 21, 2009
It took you 15 minutes to read this review? Wow. Twilight fans are dumber than I thought.

ADD COMMENTS

NAME: COMMENTS:
E-MAIL:
Security Code:
Remember my name/e-mail address
Follow ComingSoon.net on Twitter
MOST ACTIVE

Christopher Nolan to Mentor New Superman Movie?
78 new posts | 78 total posts

Terminator Rights Sold to Pacificor
15 new posts | 40 total posts

24 Feature Film Moving Forward
8 new posts | 23 total posts

Super Bowl is the Most-Watched Program in TV History
8 new posts | 35 total posts

Untitled Batman 3
8 new posts | 21 total posts

The Weekend Warrior: February 12 - 15
8 new posts | 8 total posts

CS Video: Percy Jackson Director Chris Columbus
7 new posts | 15 total posts

Tim Robbins Joins Green Lantern Cast
6 new posts | 16 total posts

Mark Millar on His Secret Superhero Movie
6 new posts | 6 total posts

Mr. & Mrs. Smith Also Being Rebooted?
5 new posts | 75 total posts

Rachel Weisz Joins Dream House
3 new posts | 9 total posts

Exclusive: James Cameron on Avatar Sequels
3 new posts | 66 total posts