Movie Reviews

Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant

Reviewed by: Scott Chitwood
Rating:
6 out of 10
Movie Details:
View here

Cast:
John C. Reilly as Larten Crepsley
Josh Hutcherson as Steve
Chris Massoglia as Darren Shan
Jessica Carlson as Rebecca
Willem Dafoe as Gavner Purl
Michael Cerveris as Mr. Tiny
Ray Stevenson as Murlaugh
Patrick Fugit as Evra the Snake Boy
Daniel Newman as Pete
Morgan Saylor as Annie
Don McManus as Mr. Shan
Colleen Camp as Mrs. Shan
Ken Watanabe as Mr. Tall
Salma Hayek as Madame Truska
Orlando Jones as Alexander Ribs
Frankie Faison as Rhamus Twobellies

Summary:
"Cirque Du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant" is worth checking out. It has a fun mix of horror and quirkiness, but it does have some troubles finding the appropriate tone and the appropriate audience.

Story:
"Cirque Du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant" is based on the book series by Darren Shan (who named the main character after himself).

Darren Shan is a normal teen living a suburban lifestyle. He has good parents, gets good grades, and is popular at school. He's best friends with Steve who is pretty much his opposite in every respect. Steve is the bad influence that always gets Darren in trouble, but they get along well.

One night, Steve convinces Darren to sneak out and attend the "Cirque Du Freak," a one night only freak show held in an abandoned theater. The boys go and end up seeing an astonishing variety of freaks with supernatural abilities. But the main attraction for them is Larten Crepsley and his exotic spider named Octa. Steve immediately identifies Crepsley as a vampire. Secretly, he hopes he can become a vampire, too.

Through a series of odd events, Darren steals Octa from Crepsley and the spider bites Steve, bringing him to the brink of death. Out of intense guilt, Darren reaches a deal with the 200-year-old vampire. In exchange for the spider antidote, Darren will become a half vampire and assistant for Crepsley. Unfortunately, this means abandoning his family, his friends, and his former life and entering a new and dangerous supernatural world.

"Cirque Du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant" is rated PG-13 for sequences of intense supernatural violence and action, disturbing images, thematic elements and some language.

What Worked:
I went into "Cirque Du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant" cold, knowing nothing about it in advance. I had only seen the trailer and vaguely knew there was a book series. The film has a number of things going for it. First of all, it's an interesting world. The various creatures and their powers are definitely intriguing. The filmmakers also go out of their way to paint the portrait of a deeply layered supernatural world filled with various factions, endless possibilities for creatures, and a lot of surprises. It's a world you want to explore a bit more after the movie is over.

The movie also takes the nearly worn out premise of vampires and does a few new things with them. Rather than ripping throats out of victims and looking goth and/or sexy, you get an un-sexy John C. Reilly as Larten Crepsley and scenes of him lightly striking people in order to draw blood. It's not as flashy as other vampires, but it's certainly more practical and definitely more like a real world vampire bat who opts for stealth over brute force.

I have to compliment the production design, too. The sets and costumes look great (though the dominance of pastels in the real world is a tad heavy handed). The special effects makeup is pretty good, too, particularly on Evra the Snake Boy. Willem Dafoe's makeup for Gavner Purl is also amusing. His vampire character has makeup caked on his face, yet has a deathly pale neck. It helps add to the quirkiness of these vampires.

What Didn't Work:
"Cirque Du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant" has a bit of trouble settling on who its target audience is. While it appears rather light, there's a fair amount of language in it. It seems like a character utters "s**t" or some variation of it every 5 to 10 minutes. That immediately makes it less appropriate for elementary age children. There are also some very intense themes and a few scary moments that make it inappropriate for them, too. It ends up being too dark for kids under 10, but it's probably too light for teenagers who are more into "Twilight" or more intense horror fare. Adults will probably be mildly entertained by it, but I don't think it's enough of a draw to get them in the theaters. What you're left with is a film that primarily appeals to people that read the books, and I don't know if that's enough to make it successful.

The film also has trouble settling on a tone. It has a bit of the supernatural wonder of "Harry Potter" and certainly attempts to paint a rich world with lots of layers like Rowling's. It has a little bit of the surreal settings and fantastic sets of "Lemony Snicket" or "Big Fish." It has a bit of the black humor and quirkiness of "Pushing Daisies." The end result is a movie that's trying to do too much and ultimately falls short of almost all of its goals. You keep rooting for it to succeed, but it fails to do so again and again. For example, the movie picks up steam when the freak show is unveiled, but the freaks end up being rather unimpressive (a poor looking werewolf, a guy with a big head, a guy with no torso) and the movie quickly departs from that realm. So the supernatural part ends up being rather uninteresting. It again picks up speed when Crepsley starts training Darren. There's a lot of comedy and funny moments between the two characters. It starts feeling like a Marvel Superhero origin story and you start thinking, "Ah! So it's a comedy! This can work." However, that comedy and action is left behind soon enough. Everything in between these moments ends up being rather dull and that's a bulk of the film. It also concludes by foreshadowing a lot of events in the next story, but you leave thinking, "The setup for the sequel sounded more interesting than this film."

The story also feels a tad rushed. For example, when Darren leaves his family, it isn't terribly convincing. The kid has an otherwise good home life, so him faking his death and leaving his family doesn't come across as all that believable. You can understand why Steve (Josh Hutcherson) would embrace the vampire lifestyle when he reveals he comes from a broken home. But Darren's transformation lacks that, and saving his friend doesn't seem like that much of a motivation since Steve comes across mostly as a jerk. I think more time should have been spent on making Darren's departure feel believable.

I also think "Cirque Du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant" may have been horribly miscast. Chris Massoglia looks good as Darren Shan, but his line delivery is terribly wooden. It gets more so towards the end of the movie. That's not a good thing to have happen in the big climax. I'm still a bit on the fence about John C. Reilly as Larten Crepsley. If this had more comedic elements, I think he would have had more opportunities to shine. But his role calls for so much action and serious moments, you start to wonder what the character would have been like if another actor had been in the role. Among the supporting roles there are a lot of great actors and actresses, but most of them have very little screentime in the movie and no real time to make an impression.

The Bottom Line:
"Cirque Du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant" is required viewing for fans of the book. Despite all its flaws, this movie is a fun escape for a while and is worth giving a chance. It will be interesting to see if it earns a sequel.

| 20 comments | Add a comment

COMMENTS (20)

Posted by:
Keath
October 22, 2009
I'll never understand knocking off points for a movie because an adult didn't see it age appropriate because of content.
Posted by:
Scott Chitwood
October 22, 2009
I could eliminate all discussion of age appropriateness from the review and there's still plenty of justification for rating this 6 out of 10.
Posted by:
ironrider
October 22, 2009
i think i will actually look into this one at first i had my doubts but after reading the review it dont sound to bad
Posted by:
Vamp-fan1987
October 22, 2009
if its too light for the darkness of twilight then i should just kill myself right here and now. the movie is not supposed to be funny or quirky or light. a young boy is supposed to be savagely killed by the end of book.... 2? (he's left out... no sam grest!! :(..) but they've ruined the plotline because they've changed or left out major characters. they changed genders/ personalities/ species of people enough to make this no longer Darren Shan's Cirque du Freak Series.
Posted by:
Its only a movie
October 23, 2009
yes you should definitely kill yourself vamp-fan...
Posted by:
tiffersaurusRex
October 25, 2009
who the hell was pete in the movie?!
Posted by:
James Tyler
October 26, 2009
This isn't "Cirque Du Freak" This is simply "The Vampire's Assistant." When you watch this movie, forget everything you know about the book and just watch it like you don't even know who Darren Shan is, then the movie is not so bad. The effects were good, the actors weren't half bad but the main problem is they left out very major events, such as when Darren and Evra and Larten go to Larten's hometown to hunt down MurlOUGH (In the film they say Murlaugh)and that is basically the entire third book. Then in the second one they were to meet R.V. and Sam Grest, two very important characters, neither which appeared in the movie. I give this move a 7/10 for at least try, but deviating from the story so far that there is no turning back to fix it.
Posted by:
andrea
October 26, 2009
even though the movie was WAY diffrent then the book it was still a good movie. but what i want to know is when it comes out on DVD.
Posted by:
Vamp-fan1987
October 27, 2009
it's only a movie: well, cirque du freak is much more than a book to me. it gave me my intrest in the genre, which lead to my writing and gave me the goal to be a published author before i graduate high school, which i still fully intend to do. so, no, this is not just a movie to me. and you can tell me to kill myself all you want, you don't know how many times I nearly have. so don't tell me what I already know. and the fact that they left out so many important characters such as sam grest and rv which changes the series so drastically I'm wondering how they do the next three. because idt there will be any vampirites... and gavner was strange they're probably leaving out the single most hysterical moment in the entire series. there wont be darius. and the christmas tree moment was adorable, and they left it out. too bad. but it's what made this a great movie. just a bad movie based on a novel.
Posted by:
Terry
October 27, 2009
really? Trailer impressions aside... you thought with a PG-13 rating the thought of appealing to elementary aged kids?

and also on the contrary... I would advice fans of the books NOT to view this...

Would I personally buy it on dvd/bluray?
Won't be on top of my list... but a worthy consideration nonetheless

Am I rooting for a sequel?
Very much so.

although only 1 point difference... I personally believe they easily deserve a Overall 7 out of 10.

ADD COMMENTS

NAME: COMMENTS:
E-MAIL:
Security Code:
Remember my name/e-mail address
Follow ComingSoon.net on Twitter
MOST ACTIVE

New Moon Breaks Dark Knight's Single Day Record
18 new posts | 101 total posts

The Twilight Saga: New Moon - What Did You Think?!
7 new posts | 203 total posts

New Kull Movie in the Works
4 new posts | 14 total posts

New Colonel Quaritch Featurette for Avatar!
3 new posts | 13 total posts

The Twilight Saga: New Moon
2 new posts | 16 total posts

The Road
1 new posts | 57 total posts

Dark Void
1 new posts | 1 total posts

Idris Elba to Play Heimdall in Thor
1 new posts | 44 total posts

The Twilight Saga: New Moon
1 new posts | 28 total posts

New Moon Breaks Midnight Opening Record!
1 new posts | 141 total posts

Thor
1 new posts | 1064 total posts

Let Me In
1 new posts | 28 total posts