Movie News

Sopranos' David Chase to Direct Music-Driven Film

Source: Paramount Pictures
March 9, 2010


David Chase, the creator and producer of the multi-Emmy and Golden Globe-winning "The Sopranos," will make his feature film directing debut for Paramount Vantage with a music-driven coming of age story set in suburbia in the '60s, it was announced today by Paramount Pictures Chairman and CEO Brad Grey, and President of Paramount Film Group Adam Goodman. Chase, who wrote the original script, will produce alongside Oscar-winning producer Mark Johnson (Rain Man, "The Chronicles of Narnia" films).

"David Chase is one of our generation's great story-tellers," said Paramount Chairman and CEO Brad Grey. "Our long friendship, and the experience of producing 'The Sopranos' with him, remain among the great joys of my career. I'm delighted we at Paramount will now continue the collaboration producing pictures together. We look forward to this wonderful film and many more to come."

A veteran writer, producer, and director, Chase has been recognized by the WGA, DGA, PGA, Golden Globes, and received a total of 7 Emmy Awards in his career.

Said Goodman, "David is in a class by himself. His creativity and talent is unparalleled, and we are thrilled and excited to be working with him on this great movie."

COMMENTS (11)

Posted by:
K.M.A.
March 9, 2010
I thought Paramount Vantage was folded into Paramount Pictures.
Posted by:
mojojackson
March 9, 2010
Chase needs to either retire or study storytelling enough to grasp the idea of an arc.
Posted by:
Csigavazz
March 9, 2010
I bet myself to come here and just see if anyone talks nasty about chase and I won. there is always somebody who birches. most of you guys can not do anything else just LAWAYS *****ING. F-U!
Posted by:
scott K
March 9, 2010
It sounds like the Wonder Years the movie. Set in the 60's coming of age story and is driven by 60's music. All you need is Winnie Cooper and I'm in.
Posted by:
mojojackson
March 9, 2010
Csigavazz:

Congratulations, you must be psychic. Who else could have predicted that a writer who strings along viewers through formulaic season after formulaic season of a series only to close the series without bothering to write an ending would have garnered a negative comment on the internet? A writer who earned complaint recieved....a complaint?? Who'd have thunk it?

I hope you get a deep sense of satisfaction out of seeing your prediction was right. Why, the next thing you know, Uwe Boll and Michael Bay could garner criticism as well. But of course, I'm no psychic. Who could predict such a thing? Why, you'd have to be some sort of genius.
Posted by:
mojojacksonisanidiot
March 9, 2010
Just because you're too stupid to understand what Chase did with the Sopranos doesn't make it bad. Formulaic? Maybe by setting the standard for how other serial television shows are made. The Sopranos is revolutionary (especially its use of music), and just because the finale doesn't wrap everything up in a pretty bow doesn't mean its bad story telling are archless. Have you ever heard of ambiguity you dumbass. Uwe Boll and Michael Bay can't hold David Chase's jock strap, much less be compared to him.
Posted by:
I like mojojacksonisanidiot
March 10, 2010
Completely agree with above poster who says that mojo jackson is an idiot. Not everyone grows or changes in their 40s. What did you want some ending where Tony repents. Some characters actually did have an arc like Meadow, AJ, Steve Buscemi's character, Uncle Junior, or Fat Bobby. This isn't Disney, moron.
Posted by:
mojojackson
March 10, 2010
Love The Sopranos or hate it, there's no way to watch the series and deny how formulaic it is. Let me sum up each season for you:

--A cool actor will be introduced at the beginning of the season (Buscemi, Pantoliano, Jackie Jr, Ritchie, etc.). A major plotline for the season will center around this character. This character will die at the end of the season.

--Tony will face a professional crisis (a rival mobster will vie for control of the Family, war with a rival Family will loom, the feds will be closing in, etc.). The crisis will increase in severity as the season progresses, leading to great suspense (if you've never seen a season of The Sopranos before). But fear not! As each previous season has taught us, Tony will barely make it out of it (his rival is killed, war is averted, Tony slips through the feds' fingers). At season's end, Tony will be right where he was at the beginning.

--Tony will face a personal crisis (his marraige is in trouble, an extra-marital affair will spin out of control, his relationship with his kids will be strained). But fear not! As each previous season has taught us, Tony will barely make it out of it. At season's end, Tony will be right where he was at the beginning. The one exception is the season that ended with Carmella leaving Tony. But fear not! They get back together the following season and Tony's right back where he started.

An ending doesn't have to wrap up every plotline in a nice little bow (it's unfortunate that you define an ending that way), but it does have to offer some kind of resolution, which Chase obviously copped out on. The ending of any great series leaves the viewer looking back over the expanse of the series marvelling at where the protagonist ended up in relation to where he began. But Sopranos denies its viewers that pleasure, because Tony's still in the same place he was ever since he became boss of the Family in sesason one. It's appropriate that Chase ended the final episode with a cut to black. Since he didn't write a conclusion to the story of the series, why should be bothered to write one for the episode itself?

If Chase had followed through on a single interesting plotline he started (the feds arrest Tony and put him on trial, his wife actually leaves him for good, a mob war actually erupts without Tony as the sure victor, a rival mobster actually deposes Tony as boss, etc.), Tony could have actually had an interesting arc.

In microcosm, The Sopranos was a great series. Great dialogue, great acting, great music and set design, fun and interesting characters, etc. It even had great individual episodes. But as an overall storyline, The Sopranos was an abject failure that went on for years longer than it should have, for the sake of lining Chase's pockets further.

Oh, I'm sorry. Was I not supposed to back my stance up? Maybe a response that was just made up of name-calling would have been more understandable. Too bad.
Posted by:
ROCK ON MOJO
March 10, 2010
Nice way to back up your argument, funny how no one else had the balls to talk more smack. You stumped the ingnorant internet know it all. I have to say at first I thought you were a regular douche, but you convinced me in your argument now to me, everyone else looks douchey!Very good sir.
Posted by:
Kyvkhbw
March 31, 2010
Tony had an arc...just didn't make it to the right side. He was supposed to change his ways after his coma. When he didn't(crime, maritial infidelity)the **** hit the fan in the end. The plot mr. Mojo was is this guy gonna be able to balance his family with his other family? Obviously he couldn't and so he dies.(I bet ya don't even hear it when it happens-baccala) That's the end. Just cause your to stupid to figure it out don't blame the writers. Best show ever

ADD COMMENTS

NAME: COMMENTS:
E-MAIL:
Security Code: Write the word seven:
Remember my name/e-mail address

Follow ComingSoon.net on Twitter
MORE MOVIE & GAMING NEWS