Craig is not the worst Bond and he in no way rips of Bourne. Bond is now what Flemming wrote him to be. If you remember back to Dr.No and Connery's first few Bond films, you will remember Connery as an ice cold man. Of course in the 60's it was cutting edge. As far as Quantum, I think more scrpit would have been nice but you have to love how they humanize him and "M". As for people saying its the worst bond movie, you obviously have not seen Moonraker. It's not in the top five Bond movies but the movie does what it is meant to, it adds a turning point in a freshly invented franchise. I do agree with that the action was overshadowed by the bumpy camera work but that is not a Bourne rip off. Many modern movies have been doing it that way, including Goldeneye! (watch the fist-fight between James and Alec. I also think its refreshing to see Bond bleed and get hurt! He hasnt shed a drop of blood since goldeneye! Ian flemming's young bond was a brute ice cold assassin who was charming because he had so little to say. The worst 007 movies are: Moonraker, On her majesty's secret Service,Die another day.

well..i personally do not believe in a "worst" james bond, as all of the actors did a fine job in portraying bond in their own unique way. Connery was brash, straightfoward and debonair, Moore was lighthearted,charming, and funny. Dalton introuduced some real seriousness to the role, Brosnan was a combo of Dalton and Moore, and Craig is simply more violent, human, and vernurable (spelling) Heck, even Lazemby brought a new sense of athleticism into his one portrayal as bond (he did all the stuntwork himself in OYMSS). by the way, i immensely enjoyed QoS, even though i liked Royale a tad better. QoS was by no means the worst film, as a matter of fact, i'd put it on my top 10 bond flicks.

I thought this was one of the worst. It was a fantasy of a fantasy with a weak story and far too many special effects in an era of too many special effects.

Quantum of Solace is the worst Bond film ever and Daniel Craig does not bring out any humour or English suaveness. In fact it was not only the worst Bond film ever, but it was a very bad movie in any case. However bad some of the old Bond films may have been e.g. Octo ***** and the Man With The Golden Gun for example, they still had a plot, they still had a story, and people with brains in their head and structured minds and a little romanticism could easily follow the story and liked it. With these new films particularly Quantum of Solace it's all about effects and nothing more - and having watched this latest one, I just felt as though I'd seen any old movie, I did not have that special tinge I had every time I'd seen a Bond movie even if it is for the 1000th time. The new Bond era has done away with the very things that made it appealing: Q Branch, M and the usual appointment before Bond setting off on his trip, Moneypenny, Women (the Bond girls roles in the new era movies believe wrongly that they are women, but I would call them those super-imposed sci-fi androgynous looking girlies who I wouldn't sleep with not if they were the last female specimens on this planet).

In short in order for the whole James Bond thing to show respect for the entire journey made from Dr No right up to Quantum of Solace, the journey should stop here and another film never be made. It's a bit like U2 who really had amazing music and albums but all they have been producing / writing over the last 10 years has been complete and utter rubbish.

Anyway one may agree or disagree with what I've said, just my two cents.

And Craig is the greatest actor to play James Bond.
....my backside is a better Bond than Daniel Craig. Daniel Craig is agreat actor but not up to the bond role at all.