PDA

View Full Version : New "Blade Runner" cut is how it should have been


Ramplate
09-03-2007, 02:59 AM
New "Blade Runner" cut is how it should have been
Sunday September 2 11:35 AM ET


Twenty-five years after "Blade Runner" was panned by critics and pulled from theaters, U.S. director Ridley Scott savors revenge with the final cut of the science-fiction film now considered a cult classic.

Presenting the new version of what he considers his most accomplished movie, Scott recalled the difficulties he had when he first pitched the work to Hollywood.

"I was a new kid on the block in Hollywood, so driving to those studios everyday was a magical mystery tour. But it was hard, the whole process of making the movie became quite difficult," he told reporters at the Venice film festival after a press screening.

"I wasn't used at that point in my career to having too many cooks in the kitchen, and I think there were many people who started to get involved.

"So out of it came a hybrid version of what I'd originally intended. Consequently ... we had a bad opening, bad previews, confused previews. I was killed by some critics ... then I thought it would be gone away for ever," Scott said.

The futuristic thriller is set in the year 2019 and follows policeman Deckard (Harrison Ford), a "blade runner" trying to catch and kill four human replicants who have escaped from a space-based colony.

The response at early sample screenings before the official release in June 1982 was so weak that the producers forced Scott to add voice-overs to the film and change the final scene to make it a more "happy ending."

Even then, bad reviews and the almost simultaneous release of Steven Spielberg's hugely popular "E.T." ended the theater run of "Blade Runner" prematurely.

But the film eventually achieved cult status through re-issue on television and home video.

Scott, 69, said he had almost forgotten about it until he saw clips on music television channel MTV and realized that his film "was having a strong influence on younger generations."

Over the years, five versions of the film have been released, but Scott said the "Final Cut" -- which will be issued as a collector's DVD edition later in the winter -- was "really as it was intended to be."

"A good film is like good book, you might go to the shelf and take it off and revisit it. There are not a lot of films I can do that with from my collection of material," said Scott, whose other titles include international hits such as the first "Alien," "Thelma & Louise" and "Gladiator."

At present, Scott is working on "Body Of Lies," one of several American movies on the war in Iraq due for release in the next few months. But he said he would like to make another science fiction film.

"I am continuously looking for that so if anyone has got a science fiction script in their briefcase, give it to me."

JBond
09-03-2007, 01:45 PM
Wasn't there already a director's cut? Yes, I'm sure of it, I own it.

vili
09-04-2007, 02:38 AM
Wasn't there already a director's cut? Yes, I'm sure of it, I own it.
It was a "director's cut" more or less in name only. While Scott gave suggestions as to what to do with the film, he was not very actively involved in editing it together, as Warner was in a hurry to get it made, and Scott was working on "Thelma & Louise".

kel thuzad
09-04-2007, 05:16 AM
YES!
YES!!!
My expectations for this are reaching impossible heights... I consider the Directors cut to be no.2 scifi movie ever made (right behind 2001). I really want to see how different this version is going to be and if it will be contributional to the already existing movie or just some cosmetic surgery...

Andrey83
09-04-2007, 02:55 PM
It was a "director's cut" more or less in name only. While Scott gave suggestions as to what to do with the film, he was not very actively involved in editing it together, as Warner was in a hurry to get it made, and Scott was working on "Thelma & Louise".


Yeah, this is actually the first directors cut, which will be very interesting to see.

I personally cant wait for this as I dont even own blade runner :D

Ewok Droppings
09-04-2007, 03:40 PM
YES!
YES!!!
My expectations for this are reaching impossible heights... I consider the Directors cut to be no.2 scifi movie ever made (right behind 2001). I really want to see how different this version is going to be and if it will be contributional to the already existing movie or just some cosmetic surgery...

Oh man - 2001 was painfully boring and hard to sit through. I have heard Blade Runner was boring as well. Haven't seen it though.

kel thuzad
09-04-2007, 08:40 PM
Oh man - 2001 was painfully boring and hard to sit through. I have heard Blade Runner was boring as well. Haven't seen it though.

Its basically detective film noir story set in amazingly blank and depressive future. And loaded with symbolism (ranging from overall story to minor elements...)
Loveable.
:)