News on Halloween 9

[LS2002]

Just when you thought the Halloween franchise was finally over, you were wrong. From Diabolical Dominion:

A fellah calling himself Jerry B. emailed me today with some pretty damn cool news about the next installment of the Halloween franchise. Apparently, Bianka Kajlick (Sarah from H8) was on MTV'S New Year's special, where she was featured in a long list of people chosen as the hottest stars of 2002. When asked what current projects she was working on she said, "Actually I'm doing the next Halloween movie which is still in the early planning stages. The script was written by Allan B. McElroy who wrote the fourth one, so that should make a lot of fans happy."

But wait, just when you think it's all good, she says, "I'm just excited to work with Busta and Rick Rosenthal again." No! Not the return of Busta!

When asked about what the newest film is about, Bianka replied "I really can't say much, but this one goes back to the idea of Michael Myers stalking babysitters in his home town and how the people of haddonfield decide to fight back. But you'll have to wait for the rest because I've already said too much. And the script always changes!"


Sounds like a better Idea then that they go in a house to make a movie. I hope Busta dies

[spiderman_2k]

Sounds pretty good...I guess...

[jbailey84]

NO!!! NOT BUSTA AGAIN!!!! ARGH!!!!!!!!:mad: Hope he dies within the first 10 mintues of the film like how Jamie Lee Curtis died in Halloween Resurrection

[JackSparrowsGrl]

I thought that he was okay in the movie but i hope he does die in this one. I am a big fan of the halloween movie series.

[spiderman_2k]

Yep kill the "trick or treat...Mother****er" off...very painfully...bastard ****ty character

[JackSparrowsGrl]

i hope he dies a slow painfull death.

[spiderman_2k]

Maybe he does some stupid ass kung-fu and breaks his own legs or something...then something heavy falls on his chest not killing him...But letting him die slowly...:evil:

[TheCritic4:20]

You mean! You don't want to hear Busta and his famous quotes!?!?

::Sarcasm::

"Trick Or Treat, Mother******

or...

"So, you want to be on Dangertainment?"

OR THE SUPER POPULAR...

"Man, who's better than Wa Chung Lee, whooping everybody ass while he smoking a Cigarette."

::More sarcasm::

[spiderman_2k]

More evidence proving the bastard should die...:D

[sniktawt]

Originally posted by LS2002

Bianka Kajlick (Sarah from H8) was on MTV'S New Year's special, where she was featured in a long list of people chosen as the hottest stars of 2002.



Didn't this air way back In January ?

Things may have changed by now.
Not a decent rumour by any means.

[JasonFan]

This rumor is false, proven by Bianca herself. She wasn't on the New Years party.

[sniktawt]

There you have it.lol.
that's a Rumour killer if I ever heard one.
End of story I guess.lol.

[spiderman_2k]

Yeah i guess not even being in the place u were supposed to say the rumour destroys all chances of it being true...

[sunflower03]

well if that rumor is false hopefully busta ryhmes won't be in the next one.

[sniktawt]

I say he probably won't.They usually head in new directions with Those films.
We Hope.

And The rumour is indeed false.She wasn't on the program.As far as I know she wasn't edited or what not either.

[Tyranic_Lord]

There is news at the official site that a 9th installment is in the works. I just hope busta does not show up in it.

[sniktawt]

Poor Busta, he was great in Shaft though.

[Arrakis]

Hey, i got some news on Halloween 9: It's gonna suck.


Sorry, I'm as big a fan of the first one as they come, but I couldn't stand any of the sequels. Which is a shame since I hold the first one in such high regard. But I don't have too much faith in this one.

[sniktawt]

I didn't want them to make part 7 and they went ahead and really messed things up.lol.

[spiderman_2k]

Part 5 and 6 blew chunks aswell....The mask in 5 was terrible

[sniktawt]

Yeah, he looked awful in those.
Those movies were "Alternate World" stories to me. They didn't really happen.I visited another world when I seen them.They were so bad the actual film makers disowned them.lol.

crap

[spiderman_2k]

Yep for me its
1,2,H20,Ressurection----The first 2 were okay...Classics but the story has gotten ****ed up...

3----Doesnt Exist In My Mind

4,5,6----Make no sense with the story..so i give up trying to underdstand how they fit with orevious ones and just watch them when i want a laugh...

[sniktawt]

There are some websites that timeline the movies using all 7 Michael films which when you read it makes no sense there are contradictions and what not.And then they timeline it with Just 1, 2,7.8.Man it is confusing.

[EnderDeschain]

Fu** part 8. Fu** Resurrection. It made everything that happened in the far superior previous ones meaningless. For twenty-four years Michael's single-minded focus in life was to kill Laurie, which he accomplishes and then...just kind of wanders. To his old house. Kills more people. Has now officially become Jason Voorhees in a different mask. Not that there's anything wrong with Jason, it's just the two had a different feel. Michael was pure, unshakable determination and will, he knew what he wanted and would travel the world, killing everyone in his path, to get it. Jason just kills whoever's around his home, just because they happen to be there. Now they're one and the same, and it really just irks me. It should have been left alone at H20.

[sniktawt]

You're right, ender, he accomplished what motivated him so what is the point ?

[Arrakis]

I didn't even see Ressurection, yet I don't feel like I've missed anything.

And you're right Ender, Jason was always a cheap knock-off of Michael, and now it's been reversed. How the mighty have fallen.

[Varian]

"well it looks like its up to me to kill michael" pinhead then says i want to do it."But i tell him to go f*** himself" and he does michael starts coming near me and then i slice his head off with my sword

[Mr.Matinee]

Here's how it goes(IMO)

Events in one take place.
Events in two take place.
Events in 3-6 never happen.
Events in seven occur.Laurie(somehow)fakes her death.Nicheal knows this,and keeps searching for her
Ressurection takes place.Now the Mask is part of Micheal's face;making him look like a freak.Even more reason to kill Laurie
hope this explians things.

[sunflower03]

i hope if they make a ninth they take the time to fix the timeline with all the different movies.

[Inval1d]

confusing :eek:

[sniktawt]

I gave up on continuity in the Halloween series , it doesn't exist.

[sunflower03]

does anyone actually have any credible news about the ninth halloween movie?

[spiderman_2k]

Well i read on a fan site that Akkad said the screenplay is done and they are now looking for a cast..ready for a summer/autumn 2004 release....Not sure if any of that is true though...

[SpunkObuffy]

www.HalloweenMovies.com is actually having a contest for people to appear in Halloween 9. Yeah .... shows how much they're really respectively treating the series. I just want a downright, gritty, back-to-the-true-storyline-of-revenge Halloween.

[spiderman_2k]

Well its only an extra role.....

The site says "the script is being written now"...also the winner is announced November 1, 2003...so things would seem to be underway for Halloween 9....

[Godzilla]

Originally posted by Mr.Matinee
Here's how it goes(IMO)

Events in one take place.
Events in two take place.
Events in 3-6 never happen.
Events in seven occur.Laurie(somehow)fakes her death.Nicheal knows this,and keeps searching for her
Ressurection takes place.Now the Mask is part of Micheal's face;making him look like a freak.Even more reason to kill Laurie
hope this explians things.

When the hell did the mask become part of Michael's face? I don't remember that!

Here's what I got from the series....

1963- Michael kills his sister when she is 17 on Halloween night.
H1 & H2 1978-Michael attempts to kill his other sister when she is 17 on Halloween night.
1978-1998: Laurie fakes her death because deep down, she knows Myers is still alive. Afterwards she gives birth to her son, John.
H20 1998-Michael attempts to kill his nephew when he is 17 and his sister once again on Halloween night.
HR 2001-Halloween night (pure speculation, I just like to think this because it didn't seem right if Laurie didn't die on Halloween). Myers finally kills Laurie. Afterwards he returns to his home.
HR 2002-Halloween night. Tresspassers at the Myers house. Mikey is rightfully pissed off. Let the bodies hit the floor.

This is just me. Am I the only one who got the message of why Michael found Laurie when she looks at John's birthday card in H20? The conection between 1, 2, and H20 was that they all happened when Michael's blood relative turned 17. Laurie was there when he came to kill John so Mike thought "Hey, why don't I kill two birds with one stone?" Ressurection was just for kicks.

If 9 is made (and it will be), they should bring back John. Josh Hartnet or a recast, this is a character that should be there.

[spiderman_2k]

I think he means in the end of Ressurection after he has been burned the mask is melted to his face....

[Doofy Gilmore]

Originally posted by EnderDeschain
Fu** part 8. Fu** Resurrection. It made everything that happened in the far superior previous ones meaningless. For twenty-four years Michael's single-minded focus in life was to kill Laurie, which he accomplishes and then...just kind of wanders. To his old house. Kills more people. Has now officially become Jason Voorhees in a different mask. Not that there's anything wrong with Jason, it's just the two had a different feel. Michael was pure, unshakable determination and will, he knew what he wanted and would travel the world, killing everyone in his path, to get it. Jason just kills whoever's around his home, just because they happen to be there. Now they're one and the same, and it really just irks me. It should have been left alone at H20.

Michael has killed everyone who was in his house ever since parts 4,5, and 6. Even Loomis mentioned that the house was sacred to him. However we have yet to find out the reason why. Most likely the thorn curse and it's infliction upon Michael has
some connection to that house. Jason killed people who visited Camp Crystal Lake simply because they were teens who he despises because they were the ones who let him drown, and he felt the land now belonged to him since his mother had been killed there and he died there as well.

[Doofy Gilmore]

Originally posted by spiderman_2k
Well its only an extra role.....

The site says "the script is being written now"...also the winner is announced November 1, 2003...so things would seem to be underway for Halloween 9....

Agreed. Whatever lucky S.O.B. or dame they pick to be in the film will just have a passing by the camera at a party sort of part.

[Doofy Gilmore]

Originally posted by sniktawt
You're right, ender, he accomplished what motivated him so what is the point ?

Not really. Kara Strode, Danny Strode, and Michael Myers Jr. are still alive. Not to mention his nephew John Tate, and I'm sure Michael would like to get some payback on Tommy Doyle after he layed the smackdown on him with that pipe in part 6.

[Mr.Matinee]

Originally posted by spiderman_2k
I think he means in the end of Ressurection after he has been burned the mask is melted to his face....
Yeah,that's what I was talking about.And Godzilla,IMO,your timeline is better than mine.

[bjgroves91]

Did Michael kill Jaime's daughter?

[Doofy Gilmore]

Jamie had a son, and no.

[EnderDeschain]

Originally posted by bjgroves91
Did Michael kill Jaime's daughter?
Well that depends on if you mean Jamie Lloyd or Jamie Lee Curtis. Must be more specific, BJ-san. If you mean Jamie Lee Curtis, aka Laurie Strode, yes. If you mean Jamie as in Danielle Harris, no.
The Strodes are not blood relation to Michael Myers. Jamie (niece Jamie) is dead. There is of course her son still out there, as well as Josh Hartnett, but is that enough? To me it is not. I guess maybe if they got back on the character of John it'd be alright, but did they do that in Resurrection? No. The whole "killing-people-'cuz-they're-in-his-house" bit just does not work for me. It takes away from the amazing focus and total lack of motive of the character. That was what made him great, to me, was that he was competely unstoppable in his determination, but there was never a single possible explanation offered up as to why he was that way. The closest we came was Loomis' "he's evil." And as far as The Curse, I have largely disregarded Dr. Wynn and all that crap, the stuff with the Thorn. The best part about it was when Michael turned on them and slaughtered them all. And Tommy was kind of cool. The part where he's in the hallway in the hospital, holding the fire extinguisher, and he sees Michael and kind of laughs a hopeless sort of "I'm-dead" laugh, that was great.

You know, I might have liked The Curse more if Danielle Harris had returned to the role of Jamie. I think seeing someone else in it sort of put a bad taste in my mouth straight off the bat. But even still, I didn't like the concept of Michael being controlled or even influenced, which is what all the cult crap was. I was like the only person in the theatre when The Curse came out, and I defended it. I defended H20. But I absolutely detest Resurrection. Maybe you and I like different things about the series, Doofy, but to me everything I did like was ruined by this single travesty of an installment. In every other movie he was after something, after someone, of his family, and while that concept was really stretched in Return, Revenge, and especially The Curse, I none-the-less could get behind it. This time, in 8, what is Michael after? Nothing. He's relegated to the role of Jason, who I used to consider Michael superior to. But I'm being redundant here, and repeating myself. I'm being redundant here, and repeating myself.

I digress. I hated Resurrection, I thought H20 would have been a fine ending, and I give many loud boo's to the concept of a ninth. But that's just my opinion.

[sunflower03]

i think i might have said this earlier in this thread but if they make another one they need to fill in the gap in the series.

[spiderman_2k]

They wont..that would make the Thorn part of the "good" side of the series...I want that crap staying with 4,5 and 6....

[Doofy Gilmore]

Originally posted by EnderDeschain
[i], I none-the-less could get behind it. This time, in 8, what is Michael after? [/B]


Michael had just finished killing off Laurie. So he was on his way back home to hibernate, the thing he does in between films where he dissappears and licks his wounds for a few years before coming after his next victim. Maybe he has to chill out at his place for awhile before to give the Thorn curse a chance to find John Tate or any ofhis other relatives. People have always wondered how Michael managed to find his relatives even though they go through great lengths to keep their whereabouts a secret. Maybe the Thorn curse inside him acts as a homing device,
and it needs time to lock onto a relative before Michael can know where they are and go after them. You know how it's rumored that one twin can feel it when another twin is dying or in pain? Maybe the thorns curse works the same way, it can emotionally connect Michael to another one of his relatives, a connection which Michael can use as a way to seek them out and finish them off. As for what Michael was after, like I said, he returned home to do the hibernation thing when he came upon these kids on his property. In usual Michael fashion, he decides slaughtering them would be the best option to get them out of his house. He can't very well re-energize in a house full of teenagers with cameras and such crawling all over the place. Not to mention that with all the net cameras they had, Michaels secret that he actually is still alive would get out to the public, which wouldn't bode well for him at all. It's similar to part 6. Michael killed off Jamie, and returned home to re-energize/hibernate/wait for further instructions whatever, then he came upon the strodes living there, and you know what eventually happened to them.
He simply doesn't like tresspassers in his house. Like I said, maybe Loomis was right when he said all of Michaels memories and his rage were all born in that house. If thats true, then theres something there that hes protecting or doesn't want anyone to know about.

[spiderman_2k]

In Halloween 2 Loomis said something along the lines of "Evil is not Witches, spooks and Ghosts, it is the subconsious mind" or something to that extent...I think the whole Thorn thing ****ed up halloween realllll good....Its so bad they dont even try and pretend it exists in H20 and Ressurection..which IMO is a good thing.

[EnderDeschain]

Originally posted by spiderman_2k
In Halloween 2 Loomis said something along the lines of "Evil is not Witches, spooks and Ghosts, it is the subconsious mind" or something to that extent...I think the whole Thorn thing ****ed up halloween realllll good....Its so bad they dont even try and pretend it exists in H20 and Ressurection..which IMO is a good thing.

I think this pretty darn near sums up my feelings on the subject. I tried to hold on and continue liking Michael, I really did. Throughout 4, 5, and 6, I recognized the fact that what I liked about the character, which is pretty well captured by Spidey's Dr. Loomis quote, was being destroyed. But I held on anyway, and tried my hardest to remain a fan of the series. When H20 came out and all the other installments past the first two were ignored, I was down-right relieved. I felt okay again about being a Halloween fan. And then Resurrection. But I won't go there again.

I see where Doofy is coming from with the Thorn stuff and all. Maybe there's something in the house that connects with Mike, gives him supernatural powers, all that type of thing. And that might be cool in another series. But this is Halloween, and Michael Myers is a man. That's what used to make him scary. He was nothing more than a normal human, but one who was so wholly, unexplainably evil that he was almost more than human. But not really. He was just so incredibly bent on his madness that it made him resilient in a way sane people can't comprehend. I think the human mind is capable of anything, and if a man is determined enough to do something, he can survive six rounds to the chest if he has to. Michael was that determined, and that's why he was scary. All of that was taken away by the Thorn stuff. He was no longer just a disturbingly focused madman, he became something supernatural. Which takes away from the believability of it which, in turn, makes it less scary. But like I said, they sort of backed off from that in H20, and he was the old Mike again, just one crazy hell-bent guy. Great stuff. The ending of H20 was really effective, and really worked for me, and then it was thrown away. The only thing I would have changed about H20's ending was I would have had Michael and Laurie die together somehow. That would have been perfect. But as it was, the ending was great, and in Resurrection all that was just tossed aside. I was sickened by it, really. Still am.

If they want to go in the direction of supernatural-killer, fine, but I won't be ponying up my eight bucks to see it, not anymore.

[sunflower03]

well if they do a ninth film, i will say this again to make it worth it, they need to fix the timeline. oh also i agree he does go after his family but he also always kills everyone who is in his house. i think it is in the fourth film that they set a trap there with his niece because they know he will return to his house. i didn't mind the premise so much for the 8th one, i was mostly disappointed in if they were going to set it up like that. they should have discovered more about michael other then he had been living under his house for all of those years. oh and also busta ryhmes was just plain annoying.

[spiderman_2k]

But then they have to include "The Thorn" into the better part of the series...which really sucks IMO

[sunflower03]

yeah but they briefly mentioned it in the second movie.

[spiderman_2k]

I dont think they did somehow....

[spiderman_2k]

In fact im sure they didnt..:D

[Jaydawg]

I'm kind of upset that they decided to basically say parts 4, 5, and 6 didn't even exist. I thought Halloween 4 was one of the best of the series. Halloween 6(bootleg one with different ending and story) was really really good.

[Jaydawg]

Originally posted by spiderman_2k
I dont think they did somehow....

Have you seen the alternate Halloween 6? It basically centers more around the Thorn issue and the ending and events are totally different from the theatrical release of halloween 6.

[spiderman_2k]

I really need to get my hands on that bootleg.

5 blew as did the Cut and edited version of 6...
But the whole idea of The Thorn was too whacked out for me...

[spiderman_2k]

I know all of the changed scenes and the changed ending and stuff, just never seen it all put together...

[Jaydawg]

I got mine off of ebay for like 6 dollars. It's VHS and the quality wasn't the best, but it wasn't bad considering the price.

[spiderman_2k]

Might check that out see what i can find.

[spiderman_2k]

This must be it right??

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3342571224&category=35025

[sunflower03]

yes they did it was written on some chalk board at the school in halloween 2.

[Doofy Gilmore]

Originally posted by spiderman_2k
In Halloween 2 Loomis said something along the lines of "Evil is not Witches, spooks and Ghosts, it is the subconsious mind" or something to that extent...I think the whole Thorn thing ****ed up halloween realllll good....Its so bad they dont even try and pretend it exists in H20 and Ressurection..which IMO is a good thing.


Not really. If a person is inflicted with a curse, they can fight it and overcome it in most cases. However, if the curse takes control of the subconcious mind, the person really has no clue or even realizes what they are doing. It's like they are basically dream walking, or in Michaels case, dream slashing.

[Doofy Gilmore]

Originally posted by sunflower03
well if they do a ninth film, i will say this again to make it worth it, they need to fix the timeline. oh also i agree he does go after his family but he also always kills everyone who is in his house. i think it is in the fourth film that they set a trap there with his niece because they know he will return to his house. i didn't mind the premise so much for the 8th one, i was mostly disappointed in if they were going to set it up like that. they should have discovered more about michael other then he had been living under his house for all of those years. oh and also busta ryhmes was just plain annoying.

Not really where he lives. More like where he hides when the cops search the place. Also, don't forget, we don't know what lies beyond that chained gate the red-head was impaled on in part 8.

[Mr.Matinee]

Like Spiderman_2k,The Thorn Curse always bothered me.In fact I
ideas of what micheal could be doing to make it appear like he' a supernatural force:

When people say he uses the Thorn to heal/find his victims/stay strong/stay alive,he could just Patch himself up and take his time finding them.Perhaps he has stamina/strength/lonjevity steriods or something.Hey,it would work.That's how he can take being run over,or shot.Having your head cut off is a different story.I can't explain that one.also,he has a determination to kill his entire family.When your that set on something,you can do anything practically.Like the scenario:a mother lifts a car because her baby is caught under it.So this could apply to Michael as well.Chasing Laurie,has his head cut off,runs off with head,sews it back on;out of determination.


But then again,this is all just my theory!:D

[spiderman_2k]

The Thorn is gay and yes doofy it did tread over what Carpenter originally wanted Michael as...The whole Loomis speech was saying that evil can be inside all of us...not just some dude infected with a curse....

yes they did it was written on some chalk board at the school in halloween 2.

Actually no, written on the board was Samhain...its a celtic word meaning lord of the dead...The festival of Samhain is October 31'st..Halloween.

[sniktawt]

I don't even bother Argueing ovet The Thorn Issue.I hate the Thorn concept.It ruined The Halloween films.And to be honest I didn't understand what was going on after Part 4.

[Jaydawg]

Originally posted by spiderman_2k
This must be it right??

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3342571224&category=35025

No, i dont think it is. As far as I know, the bootleg edition isn't available on dvd.

[spiderman_2k]

Oh well i guess ill have to find it another way.

[spiderman_2k]

Any suggestions??

[EnderDeschain]

Hey, this is horribly off-topic, but shouldn't that be "Jennifer's BoyToy" below your name, Spidey2K, as opposed to "Jennifer's ToyBoy"? Just wondering. Sorry to interrupt. But I wouldn't mind seeing that ending either, even though I'm sure it won't drastically change the feel of the movie or anything.

[spiderman_2k]

Im pretty sure its Toyboy in the UK...
Yeah i want to see it aswell..It wont change the fact that 4,5 and 6 suck...but im interested.

[Doofy Gilmore]

Originally posted by sniktawt
I don't even bother Argueing ovet The Thorn Issue.I hate the Thorn concept.It ruined The Halloween films.And to be honest I didn't understand what was going on after Part 4.

I disagree. The thorn curse may have been inflicted upon Michael, but it's obvious that no one group of people can really control him or it. Dr. Wynn and his little cult learned that the hard way. I still have a problem with the fact that theres no mention of a police investigation in any of the films following 6. I'm sure finding dead people dressed in druid outfits would've raised atleast a few questions in Haddonfield. I doubt this cult is as as small as they made it out to be in part 6. Could be a town wide thing, or more cultists still residing in Haddonfield. However since Michael killed Dr. Wynn, I doubt any of the thorn members really wanna try and control Michael any further. The first attempt didn't exactly go to well.

[spiderman_2k]

Doofy the reason there is no mention is because the film-makers knew the whole idea blew...With the timeline we are in now none of that stuff happened...

[sunflower03]

yeah and when they talk about that cursue it involves that celtic thing, because i do remember them talking about how that thorn curse came from the celts, because of how some family would be volumtarily slaughter or whatever.

[spiderman_2k]

Yes so celt is mentioned...nothing about appeaseing gods or anything...The ****ing speech Loomis gives is a proven sign that the "Thorn" didnt exist in Halloween 2...anything u say will not sway what is true..Carpenter directed #2 and had no intrest in making anything "supernatural" in the film.

[Doofy Gilmore]

I'm not gonna go along and say that the filmmakers totally 86ed the idea after part 6. If in any future sequels they decide to bring the Thorn storyline back, I'd have to eat my words.

[sniktawt]

The Thorn storyline like this debate should be put to rest forever.:)

[spiderman_2k]

Yep make it cease to exist...It didnt exist in Halloween 1 & 2...4,5 and 6 are better forgotten....
If that means the end o this thread...so be it.

[sunflower03]

does anyone have any actual news on the making of halloween 9?

[spiderman_2k]

Like been said, screenplay has been written, and a contest is being run for a fan to be an extra in Halloween 9...Apparently they are aiming for a Summer/Autumn 2004 release...

[Longshanks]

Dear lord - please spend money on something new rather than re-hashing this tired old series.

Enough already!

[ConanrulesNBC]

And this is why I don't think the Halloween movies are that scary. Same with the Friday the 13th movies. They're so boring all they do is have someone carry around a knife and stab people... ooh so creative (sarcasm). Anyways this is why I'll always be a fan of the Nightmare on Elm Street movies at least those are creative and keep you entertained.

[spiderman_2k]

Michael doesnt just go around and "stab people"..:rolleyes:

[Doofy Gilmore]

Originally posted by spiderman_2k
Michael doesnt just go around and "stab people"..:rolleyes:

Agreed. If that was the case, the lady and her daughter in the bathroom in "H20" would've been killed as well.

[sunflower03]

i heard something but it is probably just a rumor and not true. that they were going to fix the storyline wholes with the different storylines and connect them. also that they were going to make a new halloween 3 to do this since the halloween 3 that was made was an entirely different movie. i would like this to happen but i doubt it.

well i hadn't heard about the contest for the movie or anything because the place i usually go for movie news doesn't have anything listed on it yet.

[Varian]

this series should die for good just put michael against any horror icon that can kill his ass like jason,freddy,punkinhead,candyman,pinhead ect

[sniktawt]

Michael needs a Good strong gimmick to put his ass back in the Mix again.And Busta Rhymes' "DANGERTAINMENT" will not cut it.
This Halloween 3 that was mentioned above is H20 IMO.It follows Part 2 thus it's Halloween 3.
Ressurection was Part 4.Technically.

[spiderman_2k]

Originally posted by sunflower03
i heard something but it is probably just a rumor and not true. that they were going to fix the storyline wholes with the different storylines and connect them. also that they were going to make a new halloween 3 to do this since the halloween 3 that was made was an entirely different movie. i would like this to happen but i doubt it.

well i hadn't heard about the contest for the movie or anything because the place i usually go for movie news doesn't have anything listed on it yet.

For that to happen Jamie Lee Curtis would have to come back. The reason she died in Ressurection is because she did not want to play Laurie again....

[sunflower03]

yeah i know that is why i said it isn't probably true, plus i also heard that they were going to possibly recast the role because if they do do a movie to replace the third one that already exists, they would have to have a young laurie anyway. that is also why i said i doubt that would happen.

[spiderman_2k]

That wont happen meaning "The curse" and the "good films" will stay seperate...Where they belong..