ComingSoon.net Blog

« Nic, Will, Alvin & Juno Squash Aliens vs. Predator | Main | The Weekend Warrior (Lite): January 4 - 6 »

The Weekend Warrior's Terrible 25 of '07

We got the Best and now here's the "worst", at least in my opinion, of the over 300 movies I saw in 2007. Yes, some of these I walked out of and believe me, I feel somewhat bad about including those, but at the same time, I know if I stayed any longer, they would have ended up even lower on the list. They were that awful and reprehensible. The ones I did wish I walked out on but stayed through the end never got better and probably never will get better.

As much as I wanted to include movies like War and Noah Baumbach's Margot at the Wedding and the recent dog Aliens vs. Predator - Requiem on this list as well as a few others, my attempt to limit the list to 25 was very difficult, because there were so many movies I wanted to trash one more time before putting them into the vault, hopefully never to see or write about them ever again.

And away we go...

evanalmightyt25.jpg25. Evan Almighty (Universal) & Even Money (Yari Group) & Evening (Focus) - Since this is the toughest slot to fill, we'll have three similar sounding movies, all of which should have been much better considering who was involved. I mean, c'mon, Steve Carell had such a great year on "The Office" and in Peter Hedges' dramedy Dan in Real Life, so moving him into the lead slot in this sequel to Bruce Almighty should have been an out-of-the-park home run. Instead, this was a stupid, badly-conceived comedy that turns into a faithful retelling of Noah's Ark. Then there's Even Money from Mark Rydell, the Oscar-nominated director of On Golden Pond, a "Crash" like anti-gambling movie that just fell flat on its face despite a great cast including Forest Whitaker, Ray Liotta and Kelsey Grammer, that didn't have as much depth as the movies it was trying to emulate. The adaptation of Susan Minot's Evening also had a star-studded cast, a great director and was co-adapted by Michael Cunningham of The Hours, but somehow this convoluted precursor to Focus Features' far superior adaptation of Atonement just didn't offer much of relevance, and when Meryl Streep finally shows up after 90 minutes for an awkward scene in bed with Vanessa Redgrave, it was already well beyond hope of being salvaged.

24. Broken English (Magnolia) & Hannah Takes the Stairs (IFC) - Two semi-comedies about women trying to find themselves through their relationships, the first one being this HDNet film from Zoe Cassavetes, which stars Parker Posey as a neurotic New Yorker who falls for a French guy and then runs off to Paris to try to find him. Parker has given so many strong performances and this whole movie seemed fake and forced, but at least it was was scripted, unlike Joe Swanberg's improvised film Hannah Takes the Stairs, which co-starred all his compatriots in the "mumblecore" scene (that name alone kind of pisses me off) in a movie that tried hard to be clever, cool and funny ala "Reality Bites." At least Greta Gerwig, who co-wrote this and plays Hannah, is pretty hot, but no, that does not a movie make.

23. In the Land of Women (Warner Independent) - Continuing the run of badly written and directed chick flicks and another one by the kin of a respected filmmaker, this one by John Kasdan (son of Lawrence) starred Adam Brody and Meg Ryan in a Michigan-based May-September romance. It's pretty obvious that Kasdan was trying to make a cool indie dramedy ala Zach Braff's Garden State, complete with his own personal iPod playlist and all the formula elements, as it bounced between forced humor and high drama. None of the cast really seemed to have their heart in it, especially not the past-her-prime Ryan or Kristen "I'm way too bored to be able to act other than bored" Stewart. Seeing Olympia Dukakis playing the "wacky grandmother" saddened me, knowing how excellent she was in Sarah Polley's Away From Her.

22. The Game Plan & Wild Hogs (Disney) - You can say a lot of things about Disney and the great family films they've produced and distributed over the decades, but their high concept comedies continually prove that they should find someone else at the company to decide what is funny. Both of these comedies were painfully awful, unfunny and even sad at time, as you watch a great actor like William H. Macy doing ridiculous physical comedy in Wild Hogs to pay the rent so he can do cooler indie flicks. We've seen similar crap from Tim Allen, Martin Lawrence and John Travolta, but somehow, we expect better from Macy. Similarly, when you go to see a movie starring The Rock, you can't go in expecting much, and hard as it is to type this with a straight face, he's better than the material he was given in The Game Plan, playing a football player who finds out he has a daughter, played by the annoyingly cutesy brat Madison Pettis. Of course, the killer is that both movies made a ton of money, which means that someone out there found them funny and sequels seem to be a given but hopefully these were both one-offs and Disney will just take their comedy blood money and run.

augustrusht25.jpg21. August Rush (Warner Bros.) - There was a time when I really liked Freddie Highmore. He was so good in Finding Neverland with Johnny Depp, and in Tim Burton's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (again with Depp), but this year, Highmore was everywhere, and while Luc Besson's Arthur and the Invisibles just missed being included in this list, it was this New York-based musical movie about a boy who was given up for adoption by his musical parents that forever lowered this young actor in my eyes. The ludicrous premise aside, this was also one of many bad movies made by Warner Bros. in my familiar New York City neighborhoods, made worse by Robin Williams' character, a punked-out East Village Fagen known as "Wizard" who turns up and turns the movie into "Fame." Oh, and in case you're wondering, "August Rush" is the name given Highmore's character because "Wizard" thinks it's a cool name that will get people interested in his music. Seriously, folks, if you like this, you should try to find the Swiss film "Vitus," a much better movie about a musical prodigy.

20. Breaking and Entering (The Weinstein Co.) - This one's going back over a year so it might be hard to remember why I disliked it so much but it was one of the few times when Anthony Minghella (Cold Mountain) and his regular leading man Jude Law really dropped the ball. In it, Law plays a successful real estate developer who has an affair with the mother of a boy who breaks into his offices, played by Juliet Binoche. No, it doesn't make too much sense and the plot was all over the place, but all I remember is usually decent actresses like Robin Wright (Penn) and Vera Farmiga taking on these ridiculous accents to play their characters. (To refresh my memory, I went to rottentomatoes and read my quote, and even a year later, it still works: "Jude Law needs to get a new agent.")

19. September Dawn - Not necessarily a bad quality film but definitely one that really pissed me off to no end. I don't know too many Mormons, but the ones I do know seem like nice enough people, and then along comes this movie by Christopher Cain (director of Young Guns and father of Dean), which essentially attacks religious leader Brigham Young due to his involvement in the massacre of a caravan of "heathens" in 1857, comparing him to zealots like Jim Jones and Hitler. Whether Young's knowledge of the massacre is true or not is irrelevant because it seems despicable to me to attack the respected founder of a heavily-practiced religion like this film did. To me, the implications were worse than the veiled anti-Semitism in Mel Gibson's "The Passion of The Christ." It has a great cast too, including Jon Voight and Terence Stamp, but I wonder if any of them knew they were making such a hate-filled edict against a religious leader, but worst of all was that the movie tried to tie that massacre into the events of 9/11 as well. Thankfully, the movie bombed and no one was subjected to its "message."

18. Youth Without Youth (Sony Classics) - Who thought that the first movie in ten years from Francis Ford Coppola could get onto any "Worst of the Year" list, let alone ALL of them? It seems interesting at first, as we see a 70-year-old scholar, played by Tim Roth, struck by lighting and his body reverts back to his ‘40s, but then we spend the next two hours and fifteen minutes following this gloomy gus who is moping over the death of his wife until he meets a woman who looks just like her. Both of those women are played by Romanian beauty Alexandria Maria Lara, who starts phase 2 of the story by speaking in strange tongues claiming to be a "17th Century Disciple of Chandrakirti" named Rupini. (Surely there are easier ways of getting out of having sex with Tim Roth.) Besides being boring, the plot was almost impossible to follow as Roth travels around the globe trying to solve the mysteries of this woman. At one point, I had to leave the screening to read the notes to try to figure out what I was watching, which I've only had to do a few times before. The movie looks good but it's horribly painful to sit through, though it makes a bit more sense when you realize that it's based on a novella from an esoteric Romanian philosopher. Maybe my inability to understand the film is saying something more about my own lack of knowledge, but I'll gladly accept that than to ever endure this film again.

17. P.S. I Love You (Warner Bros.) - You might as well get used to seeing studio-produced romantic comedies in this list because they tend to be awful, even though at least three of the movies in my Top 25 could be deemed romantic and comedies. This late year release had so much promise, as it reteamed Hilary Swank with Richard Lagravanese who had made the terrific inspirational drama called Freedom Writers released early in the year. I remember being excited when I saw the signs in my neighborhood that they were shooting there, but no, this is another awful studio attempt at adapting a book into something that feels like an indie. This adaptation of Cecelia Ahern's novel about a woman whose dead husband sends her letters from the grave to help get over her grief seemed like a nice enough premise, but Hilary Swank uses it to spit on the generosity of AMPAS for giving her two Oscars with some of her most ludicrous behavior on film including awkward physical humor and painful to watch scenes with Lisa Kudrow and Gina Gershon as her annoying friends, Harry Connick Jr. as a loser who's smitten with her but falls into the friend zone, and Kathy Bates as her pushy mother. Sure, women probably will drool over semi-clad appearances by Gerard Butler and Jeffrey Dean Morgan from "Grey's Anatomy" as her love interests, but this is another bad attempt by men trying to create women-friendly movies that feel completely false and dumbed-down for those who refuse to think when they go see movies. Speaking of which…

epicmoviet25.jpg16. Epic Movie (20th Century Fox) - Had to catch this one on DVD because Fox wouldn't screen it for critics and after seeing it, it was immediately evident why. Essentially a low-brow spoof of some of the bigger fantasy movies of '05 and '06 including Narnia, X-Men and others, with most of the jokes involving recent pop culture references or physical humor, further putting a nail in the coffin of the spoof genre. And the worst part is there's another one of these coming out in less than a month called Meet the Spartans. Maybe this time, those who wasted money on Epic Movie will be smart enough to avoid this one. Yeah, probably not.

15. Romance and Cigarettes - Shelved for years by Sony buying MGM and the film's original distributor United Artists, John Turturro's directorial debut finally saw the light of day--self-released--and all I could think while watching it was "What was anyone involved with this thinking?" James Gandolfini was in the middle of the final season of "The Sopranos," getting accolades when this movie was finally released, following him as he sang along (badly) to ‘50s pop tunes and dealt with his dysfunctional family, including Susan Sarandon as his wife and John's sister Aida and Mary Louise-Parker playing Gandolfini's teen daughters, which involved more than a bit of suspending disbelief. Kate Winslet is the only member of the ensemble cast who comes out slightly unscathed playing a foul-mouthed hussy that could have been a precursor for her appearance on "Extras." Only mildly entertaining based on its camp factor, this movie probably should never have been released.

14. Self-Medicated (THINKFilm) - When you look at the press notes for this indie film, written and directed by 23-year-old Monty Lapica (who also stars), you immediately see all the awards its won at film festivals in random places and you immediately think it must be somewhat good. But no, coming across like a rejected episode of "The O.C.," this movie based on Lapica's own experiences, follows a teen reprobate in Las Vegas who is sent away for reprogramming to a psychiatric hospital run by a corrupt warden, but it's mostly notable for the fact that Lapica is an absolutely incompetent filmmaker and actor, making you wonder how bad the other movies at those festivals must have been for this to have been selected a winner.

13. Blood and Chocolate (Screen Gems) - This awful werewolf movie set in Romania was probably a giveaway from when the title came on the screen, but obviously, the fine folks at Lakeshore and Screen Gems were trying to replicate the success of their "Underworld" franchise. They certainly found a fine actress to star in it with Agnes Bruckner as a young girl whose family is all werewolves, a secret she has to keep from her new boyfriend, played by Hugh Dancy. You think werewolves, you immediately think blood and gore and cool transformations but with ridiculous smoke effects that changes the actors into wolves and a PG-13 rating, there just wasn't a chance for any of that, instead being a teen romance movie that fails on every level.

12. Code Name: The Cleaner (New Line) - This one goes all the way back to the beginning of 2007, a deliberately buried high concept comedy starring Cedric the Entertainer, Lucy Liu and Nicollette Sheridan--yes, that's three actors from hit television shows for those counting. The premise involves Cedric being a secret agent who thinks he's a janitor or vice versa. I have a serious crush on Lucy Liu and I've forgiven her a lot of bad movies--Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever comes to mind--but this movie was just completely inept and rarely even remotely funny. I can't remember if I included this line in my review but in my notes I have written, "Somewhere, John Candy and Chris Farley are high fiving each other that they died before taking this role." THAT's how bad this movie was, and yet, it wasn't the worst movie released by New Line in 2007. (That's below.)

11. Fay Grim (Magnolia) - How can this be? My beloved Parker Posey in two bad movies in one year? I've seen Hal Hartley's Henry Fool a half dozen times and yet this attempt to create a sequel that's more of an espionage thriller following Posey's character Fay Grim as she tries to find the title character from the previous movie was so silly, ridiculous and convoluted that I could barely get through it. Hartley entered Ed Wood territory with the terrible production values that made the film nearly unwatchable, and it was a real shame because the same year, Hartley regular Adrienne Shelley, who was murdered at the end of '06, came into her own with Waitress, while Hartley delivered an awful film that showed that his best days as a filmmaker are behind him.

magoriumst25.jpg10. Mr. Magorium's Wonder Emporium (Fox Walden) - It kills me to include this one because I really like Zach Helm, screenwriter of "Stranger Than Fiction" and first-time director of this dumb-as-f*ck family movie starring Dustin Hoffman in one of the most inane performances of his career--and considering Hoffman's career, that's saying something. Essentially, he spends the entire movie acting like a deranged Mr. Rogers or a creepier Willie Wonka, if he ran a toy store instead of a candy factory, talking with an impossible to endure lisp. Sure, it had ultra-cutie Natalie Portman looking suitably elfin with her newly cropped hair, but as we quickly learned, family comedy is not her strong point and this was a grueling experience to sit through, as Helm completely dumbed down his writing in hopes of charming the kids. I don't have any of the little whipper-snappers myself, but they'd be grounded for life if they convinced me to take them to see a movie like this one.

9. The Number 23 (New Line) - I actually liked this Jim Carrey thriller directed by Joel Schumacher better than my buddy who reviewed the movie for ComingSoon.net (I think he gave it a 1 out of 10) but it was a pretty awful attempt by the duo to do a David Fincher or David Lynch like thriller with no thrills and an awful twist that takes another twenty minutes to try to explain itself. It's clearly one of the worst movies Jim Carrey has ever been involved with and rumors have it that this was this movie caused Jim Carrey to fire all his agents. After seeing it, I'm not even the least bit surprised.

8. Hollywood Dreams (A Rainbow Film) - There's a point where you feel bad bashing on low-budget indie movies like this one and the next one on this list is just being a mean bully, but you know what? Bad movies are bad movies, regardless of their budget. (Let's not forget that my #1 movie of the year cost less than a million dollars.) I don't remember much about this one except that it was a vanity project of sorts by Henry Jaglom with David Proval (aka Richie Aprile from "The Sopranos") about a young woman from Iowa played by Tanna Frederick, trying to make it as an actress in Hollywood and falling for a good-looking actor. Frederick plays the part so annoyingly perky and whiny, chewing up every scene as if it were her first meal in years, that it's hard to sit through this awfully unfunny comedy. As I mentioned in my review, this one made "late night infomercials exciting by comparison."

7. Sing Now or Forever Hold Your Peace (Strand Releasing) - One of my good (straight) friends sings in a glee club and I'd consider that the gayest thing ever if not for the fact that I have a number of gay friends who play in very cool rock bands and do much cooler things with their lives. Maybe that's why I was so skeptical of what was obviously a passion project by apparent a capella enthusiast Bruce Leddy, about the reunion of a college a capella group, now all in their mid-to-late ‘30s. What shocked me was that I had been hearing about this movie for months, about it winning audience awards at various film festivals including the HBO US Comedy Arts Festival, but as we learned from Self-Medicated, film festival audiences really don't have very good taste and they'll embrace anything, even an agonizingly bad movie like this, which only gets worse as the characters get together at a beach house and start talking candidly about sex, the worst of them being Molly Shannon in another career and movie killing role. Oddly, this movie also starred Elizabeth Reaser, who I've been told is a talented actress despite her starring in two of the ten worst movies of the year. (The other one fell below this.)

becauseisaidt25.jpg6. Because I Said So (Universal) - As we get closer to the worst movie of the year, how could we leave this awful romantic comedy dog from Michael Lehman ("Heathers") off, as it continues Diane Keaton's downwards spiral--apparently Hilary Swank is following a similar career trajectory at half her age. Keaton hams it up and engages in some of the most ludicrous physical humor as the pushy mother of Mandy Moore who sets her daughter up with two very different guys. (How Moore's '07 follow-up License to Wed didn't get into this list is a shocker, believe me.) Things just get worse and worse to the point where I tried to get through this movie twice but was just mortified by what Keaton would do to try and get laughs. My heart also goes out to lovely Lauren Graham who deserves to be in better movies than this and Evan Almighty, and I'm always here if she needs a shoulder to cry on about life post-"Gilmore Girls."

5. Illegal Tender (Universal) - I met filmmaker Franc. Reyes a couple times over the course of the year, once at ShoWest and then again at the San Diego Comic-Con literally a day after I saw his awful follow-up to Empire. Frankly, he's lucky I didn't get my mitts into an actual review because I wouldn't even know where to begin tearing this piece of sh*t apart. Maybe you have to be ‘Rican to appreciate the story of a preppy suburban teen, played by Rick Gonzalez, once a promising young actor, who discovers that his father was a drug dealer when his family becomes the target for gangs. Produced by John Singleton, who has directed his share of popular urban dogs over the years, the movie was all over the map in terms of tone, settling into a way-too-serious family drama that culminated in one of the funniest scenes of the year as Gonzalez's mother, played by Wanda de Jesus, comes crashing out of the screen door of her suburban home with two guns ablazing ala Rambo. Fortunately, Ridley Scott's "American Gangster" showed up a few months later to make anyone who paid to see this forget all about it, and while this wasn't quite Damon ("State Property") Dash bad, it was pretty atrocious.

4. Gray Matters (Yari Film Group) and Puccini for Beginners - Two movies in the "coming out lesbian romantic comedy" genre by female filmmakers, a premise that was handled so well in Kissing Jessica Stein but has become ridiculous thanks to bad indie movies like these. Gray Matters, which was co-produced by Alexander Payne, was about a brother and sister (Heather Graham, Tom Kavanaugh) who fall for the same woman (Bridget Moynahan)… Granted, there's a great bathtub lingerie scene of Moynahan that'll make it more apparent why Heather Graham's sexually confused Gray might fall for her, but the rest of the movie is badly-written, self-involved crap. Maria Maggenti's Puccini for Beginniners wasn't much better, even if it stars Elizabeth Reaser, who as I mentioned above has gotten a lot of critical attention for previous movies, but here, she plays a wishy-washy lesbian who can't figure out what she wants and you spend most of the movie wondering why anyone would put up with her. It's not nearly as bad as Gray Matters but it gets paired together with it via guilt by association, because both movies made New York look bad, they made lesbians (even attractive ones) seem lame, and I'll be very happy if the failure of both movies forever puts an end to more movies like these ever being made.

3. The Condemned (Lionsgate) - When you have a movie starring "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, you really can't expect very much, but when he is the best actor in the movie--yes, you read that right--you know you're really in trouble and this was a high concept dog about a group of convicts put on an island with the edict to kill or be killed, all for the entertainment of "millions" of people watching this on the internet. Mind you, that's probably more people than who went to see this movie in theatres. The whole movie looks like complete crap and the writing could very well have been some of the worst of the year with one particularly funny (undeliberately) line by Vinnie Jones, justifying his rape and murder of a female convict that "She was a murderer… and a whore!" If you're not falling over laughing by that point in the movie, then maybe you should go back and rent Wild Hogs because you'd never understand the humor inherent in something like "Mystery Science Fiction Theatre 3000," though you might laugh your head off at…

2. Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie for Theatres (First Look) - I got a lot of flack for hating this movie from fans of the Cartoon Network show, but I just didn't get it and I could not understand even in the slightest how anyone could find any of this stuff funny. Granted, this was my very first experience with the "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" but still, the movie should have taken into account that some people might be seeing the character for the first time, which means they should have made some jokes that are funny to more than just the creators and their pot smoking fans. (It was the only explanation I could have for anything in this movie being considered "funny.") This movie pissed me off so much that it could have easily been my worst of the year and frankly, fining the distributor $2 million for their publicity stunt that had Boston calling the bomb squad just wasn't enough, because they should have paid me at least that amount for my time and the amount of brain cells that have been forever numbed by the experience of sitting through this.

And the absolutely worst movie of 2007 and one that would have been better off never seeing the light of day…

southlandt25.jpg1. Southland Tales (Samuel Goldwyn) - Delayed for years after its disastrous showing at Cannes, Richard Kelly's follow-up to the excellent "Donnie Darko" showed none of the genius that went into that dark thriller. It starts off well enough as a post-apocalyptic film, but then it quickly becomes obvious that Kelly was filling this with every single hair-brained sociopolitical idea he wasn't able to fit in other movies. To make it even more confusing, a time travel element is introduced around the two-hour mark, but by then, it doesn't matter because you've just sat through two hours of some of the most embarrassing performances by the likes of Sarah Michelle Gellar and The Rock (him again!) and Seann William Scott (why couldn't the latter two have reteamed for "The Rundown 2" instead?), surrounded by an eclectic mix of second, third and fifth string actors like Justin Timberlake,Mandy Moore (her again), Miranda Richardson, John Laroquette, Lou Taylor Pucci, Amy Poehler, Cheri Oteri, Jon Lovtiz, Nora Dunn, Curtis Armstrong and Zelda Rubinstein of "Poltergeist" fame. Oh, and there's a scene where Wallace Shawn (of "The Princess Bride") boogies with Bai Ling--and just the presence of the luscious Ms. Ling should be a warning to beware in itself. It's almost like Kelly went to some Hollywood agent and said, "Which one of your clients will do anything to get into a movie?" And sure enough, most of them ham it up and do whatever it takes to make it through this grueling exercise that's more disjointed than David Lynch's "Inland Empire" and nearly as long. (Apparently, 20 minutes was cut from the Cannes screening, which bodes the question, "How did Kelly decide what parts to cut when there were so many bad moments left in the movie?") By the end, you're left wondering if there was any point to the movie except maybe to make "6 Degrees of Kevin Bacon" easier to play? Yes, Kelly has made a truly awful, awful movie but this makes a great follow-up to last year's worst movie of the year, which was by another filmmaking favorite. The only thing is that Terry Gilliam has made dozens of decent movies while Kelly has only made one, making him the most sad and pathetic "one hit wonder" ever.

That's it for this year… here's hoping that 2008 doesn't suck nearly as hard.

Comments (18)

"Whether Young's knowledge of the massacre is true or not is irrelevant because it seems despicable to me to attack the respected founder of a heavily-practiced religion like this film did"

This struck me as a bit of an odd comment. It sounds like you're trying to say that even if Young was involved in the massacre, he shouldn't be criticised simply because he was a religious leader. I haven't seen the movie, so maybe I'm mis-interpreting you, but I don't see why someone should get a free pass due to their status.

Yeah, maybe that wasn't clear, but it definitely seems like one of those things that is probably not as cut and dry as this movie makes it seem.

In the movie, Brigham Young is literally made out to be a movie villain on par with Hannibal Lecter or Lex Luthor or a tyrant like Idi Amin. Obviously, he must have done SOME good if he started a religion that still has many followers to this day. I don't know enough about the incident (except what I saw in the movie) or the origins of the Mormon faith to know how involved he was with the massacre, but I felt that the movie was fairly reprehensible in the way it turned him into some sort of fanatical madman ready to slaughter women and children simply for being non-believers. It left a really bad taste in my mouth, maybe due to my own feelings about organized religion, which is generally accepting of all faiths even if I choose to follow none myself. Oddly, some of my more religious/spiritual colleagues LOVED the movie and I'm not exactly sure they saw the same message that I did.

Okay, "Evan Almighty" does not deserve to be on this list. It definitely wasn't the best family film of the year (that would go to "Ratatouille") but it was at least decent, enjoyable and entertaining. I could easily see parts in the movie where you could go "this is cheesy" or "this is silly" but not parts where you could get angry and say "this is very stupid, weak and badly-written". The film actually has interesting and honest thoughts on prayer, family, God and life in general. I think you should watch it again without being defensive on how silly the premise sounds and how crazy Steve Carell acts. I find the movie to be more thoughtful than funny...and yes, it wasn't as funny as it could've or should've been (Note to writers: just because it's a kids movie doesn't mean it can't be funny to the teenagers/adults). And it really does make kids/old people laugh (not lying, my aunt and uncle were cracking up at it - the point to where they're almost falling out of their seats/could barely breathe - when they were watching it on Christmas). So I really don't think it deserves to be on this (or any) worst of the year list(s).

And seriously?? I don't even see how "August Rush" got on this list!! I thought it was so good. And I remember it being listed at the movie as (among other categories) a fantasy movie. So...

I thought it was so good, dude. It truly made me want to go and RUN and JUMP and sing my lungs out (especially the songs in the movie). I dunno...it feels like it ignited me somehow..made me feel ALIVE. The original music...the lyrics...the honesty...the performances (I also have a mad crush on Keri Russell..not just because of her beauty, but her personality and talent ).. he emotions and the words spoken...I really liked the movie. Sure, it took a while (just a little while) to get into it but I thought it was very good. Emotionally charged. This one definitely shouldn't be on any Worst lists. It sounded like you just put August Rush on this list just to promote Vitus, which we already heard was good in your other 'best of' list so we don't need to hear it again.

Wild Hogs definitely deserves to be up there though. Yuck...and I'm sure the other ones deserve to be up there too (my dad rented the Condemned and I saw a scene or two...pure uglyness and stupidity). I don't even see why you would even bother to rent "Epic Movie" on DVD. Just the previews alone are proof that you shouldn't bother seeing it.

So yes, I definitely see why all the other movies are up there... but August Rush and Evan Almighty definitely don't deserve to be on this list. I don't see how anyone could walk out of August Rush and not feel electrified and affected.

I love to read these lists, though. Just got a little mad that August and Evan were up there. But keep up the interesting lists.


:]

Actually, I don't even know if kids would like "Ratatouille"...that's what I thought after leaving the theater the first time I saw it. It feels like they just wouldn't...sit down and enjoy it or be interested in it...I dunno

It's not just the best family film of the year though...I think it might just be the best movie of the year, in my opinion....but then again, I still haven't see No Country for Old Men and The Bucket List yet so I won't ultimately state anything yet.

Actually, I don't even know if kids would like "Ratatouille"...that's what I thought after leaving the theater the first time I saw it. It feels like they just wouldn't...sit down and enjoy it or be interested in it...I dunno

It's not just the best family film of the year though...I think it might just be the best movie of the year, in my opinion....but then again, I still haven't see No Country for Old Men and The Bucket List yet so I won't ultimately state anything yet.

I must say I agree with most of ur films on here as the worst films of 2007. But I disagree on a few things. For one, I thought Wild Hogs wasn't that bad but critics dismantled it in reviews (which is nothing new. Hell, critics liked "Little Miss Sunshine" & "The 40 Year Old-Virgin". The first was a snooze fest & the other was just utterly stupid) but a great amount of the public seemed to like it (Wild Hogs). I mean look at the Box-Office & DVD numbers that clearly shows something good was in it & it wasn't completely overwhelmed with horrifly bad sex jokes which almost every comedy today has which is really getting lame if that's all what Hollywood thinks is funny. I mean many critics thought "Knocked Up" was extremely funny (Seth Rogen is not a great actor by any means & is not all that funny to begin with) but truth of the matter is - it was more of few laughs then many laughs but I did like "Knocked Up" though, it just wasn't anything spectacluar. I find Judd Apatow films way overrated. None of his comedies don't match up with the really great comedies such as "Some Like It Hot", "The Sting", "The Graduate", "Dr. Strangelove", "The Apartment" & many more...But I must say Judd Apatow producing credit for "Superbad" & Edgar Wright's "Hot Fuzz" where pretty good. I'm not saying "Wild Hogs" is a classic by any means but it wasn't as bad as you "critics" make it out to be.

One other thing, do u have some kind of beef with Dwyane Johnson (The Rock) or something? because you act like he can't act? The guy is really not bad actor. He is really entertaining actor. It just some of his film choices are not the best of the best per say. But I have a feeling u dislike him because of where he started from as a professional wrestler & if that's the reason then get over yourself & off your high horse. I didn't get a chance to see the "The Game Plan" which I am waiting to see on DVD (Jan. 22) but from what it did at B.O. & what I have found out about it must not have been that bad.

I also don't believe u didn't put Ben Stiller's "The Heartbreak Kid" & "Evan Almighty" should be alot higher up on your worst list. Talk about a big budget disaster. There are a few small little minor things I disagree with on your films worst list but it's nothing worth mentioning about.

Starting from the end... actually, believe it or not, I'm a big fan of The Rock and have been since his wrestling days. I just wish he'd take on better movies. Doom sucked, Gridiron Gang wasn't much better, and then The Game Plan was just atrocious. On the other hand, I LOVED The RUndown (and wished he'd do another one with Scott and Berg) and I thought he was very funny in Be Cool. But The Game Plan and Southland Tales are both atrocious.

And you're the second (or third) person to be mad that I included Wild Hogs. YOu have to understand that I was really looking forward to the movie due to the premise and I actually interviewed Macy while he was on set down in New Mexico, but it was just so horendous since it went for all the most obvious physical humor and gags. It was painful to watch for me.

To explain the box office, people want movies to see and comedies tend to be the easiest for people to enjoy and they're probably not as critical about movies that go for the obvious or predictable or things we've seen before. And then some comedies I really like but they don't connect with audiences... I actually liked The Heartbreak Kid and I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry though neither did as well as Stiller or Sandler's other movies.

Just because "Evan Almighty" was a 'big-budget disaster' doesn't mean the movie was bad. Who cares what money it makes? I don't have to care because I'm just there to watch the movie, not care about it's total box office. Let's say "Ratatouille" only made $80 million total. Am I going to say "Ratatouille was stupid because it was a big box office mess"? No, most definitely not. Even if it only made $30 million total, I would still love it as much as I do...the only thing that that amount of money would show is that the moviegoing audience seriously choose the wrong movies to see. That's so incredibly weak-minded to think that a movie is bad just because it was a big-budget disaster. Not trying to start a fight, that's just my thought on that.

I do think critics are basically peer-pressured by other critics though. Like they'll see critics reviews for one certain movie and then be like "Ah man, if I don't say I hate that movie too then no one will trust me and they'll look down on me the next time they see my review on a future movie". GAME PLAN seriously was not that bad. It was definitely a good family movie and was not dull or stupid at all. I think when critics heard "Disney family movie with the Rock taking care of a little girl", they decided to write their review before they saw the movie. And so that they're not proven wrong, they publish their review anyway after the movie...which they probably didn't pay attention to at all. It was not a classic magnificent movie by any means, but it most certainly wasn't bad. at all. Go ahead and rent it, Scott...I think you might enjoy it. Also, The Rock is a good actor. Just watch Game Plan or Rundown. He actually does a very good job in Game Plan.

Finally, I don't really see what it is with critics and Judd Apatow. I admit, Knocked Up does look pretty good and it looks like it could be entertaining, but Walk Hard and Superbad just look incredibly stupid (except I can't help but laugh at McLovin'), unnecessarily incredibly come-on-guys-you're-just-overdoing-it vulgar, and I'm sad to see that Jenna Fischer (who plays the adorable Pam Beesly on "The Office") took a part in Walk Hard, too. ::Sighs:: I'm actually pretty happy that Walk Hard bombed. I remember seeing the first trailer, and I absolutely hated it (did not look funny AT ALL). I still hate it.
And critics are like "these raunchy comedies also have a LOT of heart". Why do we need raunchy vulgar sex joke-filled humor in movies with "heart" now. If you want a really funny, wholesome movie with heart, just see "Dan in Real Life". Do we really need raunchy humor included in? Nope. I really see no point. Just do one or the other guys. Don't try to trick us with this "there's a heart in the middle of the raunchy humor" crap.

And Diane Keaton is a scary, retarded, old hag. Just look at the commercial for her new movie in January.

Oh yeah...and Wild Hogs WAS very bad. I actually shut the DVD off (my parents rented it and somehow enjoyed it) at the 30-minute mark. Seriously.... It bored me too somehow. So not only was it unfunny, but it was so unfunny that it was boring. The only DVD I ever shut off halfway through was "Elizabethtown".

Yo Ethan, I think u miss understood me on the Evan Almighty matter or I just didn't explain myself well enough. I am not dissing the movie because of it's Box-Office gross by any means (hell, I'm an independent filmmaker). I am calling it bad because It was just that. I'm very passionate moviegoer & yes in all honesty if I was judging a movie just by it's gross then I would say I would be weak-minded.

EDouglas I was just wondering & thanks for commenting.

Ethan, I don't think the point is that people see how well or poorly a movie does at the box office and then decide to see it but you can definitely tell how people feel about a movie by box office behavior. AVSP is a good example of this as it did really well on Tuesday and then quickly dropped off. If people were liking the movie, it would still be doing well. Same with Evan Almighty, which underdelivered across the board.

And you really shouldn't knock the Judd Apatow comedies until you've seen them. (I'm assuming you haven't of course) Just because something looks bad or stupid in the trailers or commercials, doesn't mean that the movie is stupid or bad. These trailers/commercials are put together by marketing guys who have to do whatever it takes to get people into seats and sometimes, you can't include some of the funniest scenes. That's where critics and reviews come in to help shuffle through the marketing bull to help viewers decide where to spend their money. And then of course, there's word-of-mouth from friends whose opinions you trust.

But of course, movies are such a subjective thing that you have to use your own judgment in the end.

Actually, all my friends that I trust told me not to see it because of how trashy it is. They told me it's realistic with it's portrayal on teenage boys, but that doesn't mean it needs to be seen. I saw a few clips from it at Comic-Con and chuckled at McLovin's ID scene and the scene where Jonah Hill is hit by a car, and then I saw a few scenes at my cousin's house (Evan Almighty in one room, Superbad in the other...both with Jonah Hill) and didn't really see anything funny in it, just vulgar stuff. I've decided not to see the full movie because of opinions from my friends, and just because of common sense of what I like and don't like to see in movies. :] I still would kinda like to see Knocked Up though. And Walk Hard...JoBlo said that too. They said "Dude, this movie looks so stupid" and then they released the 'red-band' trailer and then they said, "Oh it looks funny now". I watched the red-band trailer and it still didn't look funny at all. I also read Scott Chitwood's review on it, and I decided that I wouldn't like to see a humongous penis on screen either. Haha.

And thank you for clearing that up, Scottland. Sorry but I've seen/heard some 'movie fans' say stuff like "Aw man, that movie sucks. It was a box office bomb". And I'm like..."Okay...but did you actually see the movie?". "No but it bombed, so..."

Kind of like how girls are with Johnny Depp and movies...

Girl: Oh man, I saw Sweeney Todd. Johnny Depp is so hot
Guy: Okay...but was the movie good?
Girl: ..Johnny Depp was so hot..

Now I heard from my brother that Sweeney was actually incredibly good (best movie of the year he said, actually. He's not a emo/goth either so its not a bias opinion), so I'll probably go and see it. But I thought Pirates 3 SUUUCCKKKKED, and I kept on hearing girls at my work say "Oh my god, did you buy Pirates 3 yet?. I lovvvee Johnny Depp". And I'm like "What?? Pirates 3 sucked!!". And then they'll say "No, Johnny Depp makes any movie good". It annoys the hell out of me.

Anyway, glad you didn't mean it like that. I'm an independant filmmaker too by the way.

Hey Ed, aren't you supposed to have a "Top 10 Movies I'm Looking forward to the most in 2008" list up soon?

I agree with most of those but i have a couple problems with the list.
My first problem is Evan Almighty should be WAY lower on the list,I would rather watch Epic Movie than Evan Almighty.
My second problem with the list is The Game Plan. Seriously? I feel Wild Hogs deserves it's place there, but The Game Plan should be on a Best 25 movies list, not the other way around.

Sorry, but I disagree with you about the fact or fiction of Brigham Young's guilt in the Mountain Meadows Massacre.
Also, he WAS NOT the founder of the Mormon Church. It was founded by Joseph Smith Jr who completed writing the Book of Mormon on July 1, 1829. It was Smith who claimed to have seen and spoken to God and Jesus, not Young. It was Smith who claimed to have translated the gold plates containing the Book of Mormon that he claimed were left buried near his home near Palmyra NY in America by the ressurected Israeli prophet Moroni, along with a compass, Brestplate, sword and the Urim and Thummim (a pair of stones Smith claims he used to translate the plates into the Book of Mormon).

One month after those people were slaughtered by his minions, Young was riding around SLC in one of their fine carriages.
According to a decendent of the wagon train leader, the massacre wasn't performed for religious purposes, but simple greed on the part of Mr. Young. The value of the wagons, horses and equipment was appx $300,000 which was a LOT of money back then.
As to his piousness, a simple quote from him can demonstrate his "benign" attitude:

And if the Gentiles wish to see a few tricks, we have “Mormons” that can perform them. We have the meanest devils on the earth in our midst, and we intend to keep them for we have use for them; and if the Devil does not look sharp, we will cheat him out of them at the last, for they will reform and go to heaven with us.—Brigham Young, January 17, 1858 , Journal of Discourses , Vol. 6, p. 176

I don't know about you, but that doesn't sound like a gentle man to me!

As to the ties to 9/11, that is a reach to me as well. It would only be equivalent if the basis for the massacre were religious in nature. In that case, it would be exactly the equivalent of 9/11/2001 since they would have both occurred on the same day and for the same reason.
Yet the descendent of the waggon train leader doesn't believe this to be so and how can I argue with one who lost a major portion of his ancestors in this massacre?
What does cast a huge shadow upon the Mormon Church is its continuous defense of Mr. Young's actions. This continues to this day, with the LDS buying up Internet URLs so they can't be used to tell the story. If you don't believe this go to the URL:
http://mountain-meadows-massacre.com or the .org equivalent and see what comes up.

If Young didn't have anything to do with this massacre, then why was he PARDONED for this crime in 1858? Since when do we grant pardons to innocent people?
If you have further doubts about Young's guilt in this crime, how about quotes from the US Government and Mormons such as:

Colorado Territorial Governor Alfred Cummings (Utah was part of the CO Terr) who was appointed to replace Young shortly after the massacre told the Salt Lake Daily Tribune he believed Young "to have been the prime mover in the conspiracy that consummated that massacre, and that he ought to have been indicted as an accessory before the fact." Cummings went on to describe Young as " one on the damndest rascals that ever went unhung."

The LDS claimed that they were defending against US troops but that is a bold faced lie since the US troops were established at Ceder Valley 30 Mi outside of SLC in June of 1858, three months before the massacre. This was two months after Young allowed Governor Cummings to establish his office in Salt Lake City on April 12, 1858.
If that doesn't sound like Hannibal Lecter, what does?

or
Helen Brockett, a niney-two-year-old descendant of a Salt Lake City Mormon, was told by her grandmother that her great-grandfather J. J. Davidson had been ordered by Brigham Young to go south to participate in the slaughter." Instead, Davidson "backtracked through a river bed" and fled to California. For years afterward he lived in fear of Young's retribution.

or
The apostate Bishop Philip Klingensmith, of the Cedar City Ward was reportedly chased into Sonora Mexico and killed by Brigham Young's men. This was his reward for refusing to participate in the massacre.

If you really want to learn about the massacre, the site set up by the ancestor I mentioned is at: http://1857massacre.com/

While he does get a bit carried away at times, the basic story is still compelling and there are a large number of links off of this site to photos, lists of participants, etc. Some of the quotes I posted above came from this site.

Finally, just because someone creates a large religious following, that doesn't necessarily mean that this person is a great person themselves. After all, Christianity wasn't made the massive religion we know today by Jesus. It was a small Jewish cult following until taken up by Emporor Constantine of Rome. Yet before his conversion to Christianity, Constantine shared the emperorship while over 3,500 christians were tortured and murdered and tens of thousands more were imprisoned and tortured.
I'm sure the same can be found in all of the other major religions of the world, so building of a great religion doesn't equate to personal goodness as far as I can see.

So if you don't like the movie, at least base it upon your dislike of the acting or direction, etc. Not upon what you percieve to be lack of truth. Since in this case, even a light reading of Young's actions as a Mormon leader (attacks upon US Government troops and supply trains, destruction of Federal Military forts, deliberate destruction of property and crops, manufacture of weapons to wage war against the legal government of this nation, etc) will show that there is far more truth in this movie than in most products from Hollywood with the exception of the connection to 9/11.

Yea, this list pretty much sums up the bombs of 2007, except for 2 movies:
Knocked Up- I know you mentioned this movie, but it was god awful. It was cool to see the guys from Undeclared and Freaks & Geeks, but I was really let down with this one because I expected it to be hilarious.
Norbit: Clearly, Eddie Murphy has sunk to an all-time low with this piece of garbage. I didn't laugh once during this movie and I'm soooo glad I didn't waste $10 on it at the theater. Why does he have to be every character in every one of his movies? I know it did OK at the box office, but why?

Smith doesn't come off too well in the movie either. Maybe I'm just confusing my names. (Been a long time since I saw it since it was originally going to come out in early May)

"Hey Ed, aren't you supposed to have a "Top 10 Movies I'm Looking forward to the most in 2008" list up soon?"

Yeah, we've talked about it and if people really want to see it, we'll do something up, probably for next week.

Interesting list. I actually liked some of the movies on this list but I guess it's because I'm young and those kinds of movies appeal to me.

With that being said, I'm surprised Hostel 2 and every other horror/torture porn movie released in 2007 (with the exception of Saw IV which was at most decent I guess) was not on this list. I was supposed to see Hostel 2 in theatres but one of my friends convinced us to see Knocked Up instead. Best decision I've ever made in my life (well one of them anyway lol). Hostel 2 was seriously one of the worst movies I saw this year (if not the worst). It was stupid, pointless and random which is disappointing because I actually thought the first one was pretty good.

I guess I should have put this comment on your "top 25" best movies list, but why do people love Ratatouille so much? I've seen it two and a half times now (I fell asleep the first time I saw it) and I really don't get the appeal. Yeah it was better than some of the other animated movies that came out in '07 (I'm looking at you Shrek The Third) but I don't think it was as terrific as others say it is.

DeeDee, maybe I loved Ratatouille because I'm such a big foodie... I love watching the Food Network and Top Chef and the like and living in New York City, it's hard not to be tickled by the thoughts of rats in the kitchen cooking :)

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Search


About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 31, 2007 11:56 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Nic, Will, Alvin & Juno Squash Aliens vs. Predator.

The next post in this blog is The Weekend Warrior (Lite): January 4 - 6.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

COMINGSOON SECTIONS: Main | Features | Movie News | Trailers & Clips | Film Database | Movie Release Dates | Movie Reviews | Top Previews | Production Stills | Awards Central | TV News | DVD News | DVD Release Dates | DVD Reviews | The Weekend Warrior | Box Office Report | Boards | Contact Us | News Feeds | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Superhero Hype! | ShockTillyouDrop.com | DVDfile.com

Hosted by NEXCESS.net


Comingsoon.net, A property of CraveOnline, a division of AtomicOnline, LLC. © 2009 CraveOnline Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

MORE IN THE CRAVE FILM CHANNEL: ONLINE VIDEOS AND CRAZY VIDEOS AT CRAVEONLINE | SUPERHERO HYPE! | SHOCKTILLYOUDROP.COM | DVDFILE.COM